Comparison on seismic resilience of hybrid, isolation, and damping control reinforced concrete frame-shear wall buildings

To investigate the effectiveness of different vibration control methods in realizing seismic resilience of reinforced concrete (RC) frame-shear wall structures, four cases with different control methods were designed, including the damping control building using energy dissipation cladding panels (EDCPs) (RCFSW7-D), isolated building (RCFSW7-I), isolated building with enhanced stiffness of superstructure (RCFSW7.5-I), and hybrid control building using both EDCPs and isolation (RCFSW7-H). The critical seismic responses and resilient performance of four cases were analyzed based on the Chinese code. Maximum inter-story drift ratios (MIDRs) of RCFSW7-I, RCFSW7.5-I, and RCFSW7-H under maximum considered earthquake were 36%, 51%, and 72% lower than that of RCFSW7-D, respectively. Although the stiffness of superstructure of RCFSW7.5-I and RCFSW7-H were approximately identical, the MIDR of RCFSW7-H was 44% smaller than that of RCFSW7.5-I. Meanwhile, the maximum absolute floor accelerations (MAFAs) of three isolated structure under MCE were approximately 70% lower than that of RCFSW7-D. The seismic resilience level of RCFSW7-D was Level 1, which is dominated by the damage of structural components (SCs) controlled by MIDR and acceleration-sensitive non-structural components (ASNSCs) controlled by MAFA. The seismic resilience levels of RCFSW7-I and RCFSW7.5-I successfully increased to Level 2, leading by the effectively control of MAFA and damage of ASNSCs. However, the MIDR was not sufficiently controlled even the stiffness of superstructure was increased. In contrast, hybrid control building significantly reduced both the MIDR and MAFA through the currently utilization of seismic isolation and EDCPs, especially the MIDR and damage of SCs, leading to a seismic resilience level of Level 3.