Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture for Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

荟萃分析 随机对照试验 针灸科 医学 系统回顾 替代医学 梅德林 内科学 生物 病理 生物化学
作者
Liang Ding,Yan Xiao
出处
期刊:PubMed
标识
DOI:10.1177/27683605251363181
摘要

Introduction: Obesity poses an important public health concern globally, requiring effective and safe interventions. Acupuncture, a traditional Chinese medicine therapy, is increasingly used to address various health conditions, including obesity. Previous systematic reviews have examined acupuncture for obesity, but none have comprehensively synthesized evidence from both English and non-English-language databases with rigorous methodological assessment. This review addresses this gap by providing an updated synthesis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating acupuncture's effectiveness and safety for obesity management. Aim and Objectives: The primary goal of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of various acupuncture treatments; it includes acupressure, auricular acupuncture, auricular acupressure, and more treatments for obesity. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether these acupuncture therapies are as effective as placebos or traditional treatments for weight loss. Additionally, we aimed to systematically assess the safety profile of acupuncture by examining the types and frequency of adverse events reported across trials. Method: We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, ISI Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP Database from inception to September 2024 without language restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. We included RCTs comparing acupuncture interventions (manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, laser acupuncture, auricular acupuncture, or acupressure) with placebo, sham treatments, lifestyle interventions, or medications in adults with obesity (body mass index ≥30 or ≥25 kg/m2 for Asian populations). We excluded studies combining acupuncture with other therapies except diet, as diet modification is standard care for obesity. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology. Results: Of 202 identified records, 20 RCTs (n = 2261 participants) met inclusion criteria. Fifteen RCTs with complete data were included in meta-analyses. Compared with lifestyle interventions, acupuncture resulted in additional weight loss of 1.72 kg (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-2.93, I2 = 20%, five studies, n = 237). Compared with placebo/sham treatments, acupuncture achieved greater weight reduction of 1.56 kg (95% CI: 0.78-2.34, I2 = 0%, eight studies, n = 412). When compared with medications, acupuncture showed superior weight loss of 3.0 kg (95% CI: 1.53-5.88, I2 = 20%, two studies, n = 120). Risk ratios (RRs) for obesity remission favored acupuncture over lifestyle interventions (RR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.98-3.34, six studies) and medications (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.12-7.20, four studies). Only one trial reported adverse events systematically, documenting mild effects in 16.7% of acupuncture participants versus 42.9% in the medication group. GRADE assessment indicated low to moderate certainty of evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests acupuncture may provide modest benefits for weight loss compared with lifestyle interventions or placebo treatments, with a favorable safety profile compared with medications. However, the low to moderate certainty of evidence due to methodological limitations prevents definitive conclusions. Acupuncture should be considered as a complementary rather than primary intervention for obesity management, pending more rigorous research. Well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols, longer follow-up periods, and systematic adverse event reporting are urgently needed.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
pxd完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
xiaobo完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
leezz发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6应助无语的千儿采纳,获得10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助无语的千儿采纳,获得10
3秒前
minion完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6应助现在拨打采纳,获得10
3秒前
582发布了新的文献求助30
3秒前
wjy发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
fluu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
Foalphaz发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
酥梨梨发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
唐很甜完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
CodeCraft应助晨晨采纳,获得10
5秒前
littleblack发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
隐形发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
研友_ZbKr48完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
AD应助李hk采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
Stella应助xiaoze采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
隐形曼青应助dailing采纳,获得30
7秒前
曾泳钧发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
共享精神应助精明一寡采纳,获得10
7秒前
fudandan发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
liuhll发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
8秒前
科研通AI2S应助谨慎的雨梅采纳,获得10
8秒前
爆米花应助酷炫葵阴采纳,获得10
9秒前
WYX发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
见野完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1621
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] | NHBS Field Guides & Natural History 1500
The Victim–Offender Overlap During the Global Pandemic: A Comparative Study Across Western and Non-Western Countries 1000
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 1000
Brittle fracture in welded ships 1000
King Tyrant 720
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5588119
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4671184
关于积分的说明 14786238
捐赠科研通 4624496
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2531592
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1500217
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1468240