Associations between airborne pollen, pollen-related allergic rhinitis and blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

花粉 荟萃分析 医学 免疫学 环境科学 生物 植物 内科学
作者
Alexandra Bürgler,Sarah Glick,Axel Luyten,Shihua Shi,Marloes Eeftens
出处
期刊:Environment International [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:200: 109517-109517
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109517
摘要

Allergic rhinitis (AR) due to pollen affects an estimated 18% of adults globally, but is often trivialized. While there is evidence for an association between high pollen exposure and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as well as multiple plausible mechanisms suggesting pathways via blood pressure (BP) elevation, no overview exists to date. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate whether 1) pollen-related AR and 2) exposure to airborne pollen are associated with BP and/or hypertension. We further evaluated which personal characteristics may modify a potential association and identified research gaps. We searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases and systematically reviewed studies focusing on human populations published between 1 January 1990 and 20 September 2023 that presented data on the association between pollen-related AR or pollen exposure and BP or hypertension. We assessed the risk of bias with a customized version of the Risk of Bias tool by the Office of Health Assessment and Translation of the National Toxicology Program (OHAT), conducted random effects meta-analyses of comparable studies and assessed the certainty of evidence according to OHAT recommendations. We carried out sensitivity analyses, excluding studies with a high bias rating. We identified 24 studies, ranging in sample size from 41 to 9'548'939 participants. Of these, 23 had a cross-sectional design, and the remaining article included both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Investigated exposures were binary pollen-related AR status (23 studies) and within and outside of pollen season (one study), but no study investigated measured pollen exposure (zero studies). Around half of the studies (13/24) were afflicted with high selection and confounding bias. Data from 22 studies using pollen-related AR status as exposure could be included in meta-analysis, to which eleven studies contributed hypertension data, four studies BP data, and seven studies both. In meta-analysis, we found an adjusted odds ratio of 1.16 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.91, 1.47) for hypertension and mean differences of 0.99 (95 % CI: -0.09, 2.07) and 0.40 (95 % CI: -0.41, 1.21) for adjusted systolic and diastolic BP, respectively. Results for crude pooled meta-estimates were similar, and none showed statistically significant differences. We rated the overall certainty in the evidence as very low, mainly due to cross-sectional designs, selection and confounding bias and indirectness of exposure. This review shows that there is insufficient evidence to decide whether pollen-related AR is associated with BP or hypertension to date, and therefore does not support a clear mediating role of BP in the relationship between pollen allergy and cardiovascular events. Studies that 1) investigate BP or hypertension as the main outcome and provide adjusted estimates to avoid selection and confounding bias, 2) define AR as solely triggered by pollen and 3) have longitudinal designs were not identified. The certainty of the evidence is therefore limited by (1) reliance on cross-sectional studies, which prevents conclusions about causality, (2) high risk of selection and confounding biases which could not be adjusted for, (3) heterogeneous and indirect definitions of pollen-related AR, and (4) an exclusively binary exposure assessment (with or without pollen-related AR), which limited the ability to study an exposure gradient. Given these limitations, further cross-sectional studies are unlikely to yield clearer results, whereas repeated measurement designs could offer more valuable insights. This review was primarily funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF, grant No. 185864) and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 853568). We pre-published the protocol and search strategy on the PROSPERO website (registration number CRD42022381907).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
情怀应助潇洒哥的黑斗篷采纳,获得10
刚刚
高贵尔竹发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
湘湘完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
LIZHEN发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
zhangjie关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助Charlee采纳,获得10
5秒前
曹文鹏发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
动听健柏发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
顾矜应助高贵尔竹采纳,获得10
6秒前
路ll完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
LIZHEN发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
端庄忆梅发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
khwafdoih完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
星星火完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
缓慢灵槐发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
cdercder应助独特的翠芙采纳,获得10
11秒前
coke老师发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
bkagyin应助zwd采纳,获得10
16秒前
17秒前
发发发完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
丰富的寇发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
20秒前
香蕉觅云应助hh采纳,获得10
20秒前
22秒前
发发发发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
coke老师完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
酷波er应助感动的红酒采纳,获得10
24秒前
Charlee完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
飘逸向秋完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
千迁完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
佳怡发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
cytheria发布了新的文献求助30
27秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
The Effective Clinical Neurologist 3ed 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7715016
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9270233
关于积分的说明 20080898
捐赠科研通 7291308
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3298316
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2452559
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2305802