A war or merely friction? Examining news reports on the current Sino-U.S. trade dispute in The New York Times and China Daily

The ongoing Sino-U.S. trade dispute between the world's two largest economies has since 2018 attracted much attention from the international media. This study used the approach of corpus-assisted discourse studies to compare how leading English-language newspapers from each side—The New York Times (NYT) and China Daily (CD) — discursively constructed this issue. The findings indicated that while NYT tended to profile the trade conflict as a 'war' in line with mainstream hard-line ideologies that emphasize China's presumed threat to national security of the U.S., CD sought to dial down the rhetoric and showed a preference for defining the matter as a 'friction', consistent with the tenet of 'pragmatic nationalism' endorsed by the Communist Party of China. Accordingly, the two newspapers framed the causes, moral evaluation/consequences, and treatment of the issue in congruence with their respective dominant metaphors by means of various linguistic patterns. These differences are interpreted with regard to each side's underlying ideologies and national interests.