透明度(行为)
标识符
科研诚信
元数据
科学诚信
出版
公共关系
科学出版
政治学
万维网
计算机科学
业务
会计
图书馆学
工程伦理学
工程类
法学
程序设计语言
作者
Marcia McNutt,Monica Bradford,Jeffrey M. Drazen,Brooks Hanson,Bob Howard,Kathleen Hall Jamieson,Véronique Kiermer,Emilie Marcus,Barbara Kline Pope,Randy Schekman,Sowmya Swaminathan,Peter J. Stang,Inder M. Verma
标识
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1715374115
摘要
In keeping with the growing movement in scientific publishing toward transparency in data and methods, we propose changes to journal authorship policies and procedures to provide insight into which author is responsible for which contributions, better assurance that the list is complete, and clearly articulated standards to justify earning authorship credit. To accomplish these goals, we recommend that journals adopt common and transparent standards for authorship, outline responsibilities for corresponding authors, adopt the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) (docs.casrai.org/CRediT) methodology for attributing contributions, include this information in article metadata, and require authors to use the ORCID persistent digital identifier (https://orcid.org). Additionally, we recommend that universities and research institutions articulate expectations about author roles and responsibilities to provide a point of common understanding for discussion of authorship across research teams. Furthermore, we propose that funding agencies adopt the ORCID identifier and accept the CRediT taxonomy. We encourage scientific societies to further authorship transparency by signing on to these recommendations and promoting them through their meetings and publications programs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI