责任
资产(计算机安全)
法律地位
营销
业务
功能(生物学)
实证研究
社会学
公共关系
法学
政治学
计算机科学
会计
计算机安全
认识论
进化生物学
生物
哲学
作者
Matthew S. Bothner,Young-Kyu Kim,Edward B. Smith
出处
期刊:Organization Science
[Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences]
日期:2012-04-01
卷期号:23 (2): 416-433
被引量:127
标识
DOI:10.1287/orsc.1110.0679
摘要
Two competing predictions about the effect of status on performance appear in the organizational theory and sociological literatures. On one hand, various researchers have asserted that status improves performance. This line of work emphasizes tangible and intangible resources that accrue to occupants of high-status positions and therefore pictures status as an asset. On the other hand, a second stream of research argues that status instead diminishes performance. This alternative line of work emphasizes complacency and distraction as deleterious processes that plague occupants of high-status positions and thus portrays status as a liability. Which of these two perspectives best characterizes the actual performance of individuals in a competitive setting? And are they in any way reconcilable? In this paper, we summarize these two perspectives and test them in two empirical settings: the Professional Golf Association (PGA) and the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing (NASCAR). Using panel data on the PGA Tour, we model golfers' strokes from par in each competition as a function of their status in the sport. Using similar data on NASCAR's Winston Cup Series, we model drivers' speed in the qualifying round as a function of their status in the sport. We find curvilinear effects of status in both contexts. Performance improves with status until a very high level of status is reached, after which performance wanes. This result not only concurs with the view that status brings tangible and intangible resources but also provides empirical support for the contention that status fosters dispositions and behaviors that ultimately erode performance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI