Advance Care Planning In Adults with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

作者
Frederick Bartholomew,Laura M. De Castro
出处
期刊:Blood [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:116 (21): 391-391 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.v116.21.391.391
摘要

Abstract Abstract 391 Advance Care Planning (ACP) is the process by which patients, families and health care practitioners consider their values and goals and express preferences for future care. Written ACP includes living wills, designation of a health care proxy, and do not resuscitate (DNR) orders. ACP provides a legal framework for end-of-life decisions and aligns patient's care with his/her end-of-life decisions if their decision-making ability becomes compromised. The high mortality and potential for unexpected deadly complications among sickle cell disease (SCD) patients, suggests that end-of-life care conversations between patients, family members and providers should be a necessary and helpful aspect of routine health care. Despite the early mortality of SCD patients, there is a lack of information regarding: 1) use of ACP in this population; 2) need for ACP as perceived by patients; and 3) psychosocial impact of ACP information. We therefore performed a study with a three-fold purpose: 1) to determine patient's perceived need for ACP information and their experiences with ACP: thoughts, wishes, and comfort discussing ACP; 2) to explore how an informational intervention designed to teach patients how to understand and complete ACP changes patients' perception of need and comfort discussing ACP and 3) to examine the impact of ACP information on patient perceptions of disease controllability. We hypothesized that when asked about ACP planning, most SCD adults would indicate thinking about ACP issues, but a significant portion of this population would not have completed advance directives and/or indicated specific end-of-life wishes. All 70 subjects -47 (67%) females and 23 males- completed a Pre-Informational Questionnaire (Pre-Q), 60 requested and received the ACP education session, and 62 completed the Post-Informational Questionnaire (Post-Q). Mean age for the patients studied was 38.07 years (females 40.3, males 33.6). Sickle genotypes were as follows: HgbSS / Sβ0thal genotype: 45 (64%), HgbSC 16 (23%), and HgbSβ+thal 9 (13%). Sixty one (87% of the subjects), reported not having written decisions for end-of-life medical treatment. All 9 patients with written decision were females. The mean age was significantly different (p=.0128) between those with written decisions (52 yrs, 32 – 77 yrs) and those without (35 yrs, 18–60 yrs). Fifty-four of those who completed the Post-Q reported not having written ACPs when enrolled in the study. Mean time between completion of Pre-Q and Post-Q was 11.6 weeks (range 3 – 41).Sixty one patients requested ACP information. The mean age of those who did not want ACP information was 34.7, while the mean age of those who did was 38.6. All patients who had written ACPs requested more information. Variables Pre – Q N=61* Post – Q N=54** Thoughts on whom you would like to make decisions Very Much 17 (28) 25 (47) Somehow 29 (47) 23 (43) Not much 15 (25) 5 (9) Specific wishes about medical treatments Yes 28 (46) 30 (55) No 5 (8) 8 (15) Not sure 28 (46) 16 (30) Comfort level Taking with Family A 39 (64) 33 (61) B 11 (18) 15 (27) C 3 (5) 4 (8) D 3 (5) 1 (2) E 5 (8) 1 (2) Taking with SCD provider A 33 (54) 32 (60) B 19 (30) 16 (30) C 3 (5) 3 (6) D 3 (5) 2 (4) E 5 (8) 1 (2) Appointing someone A 28 (46) 26 (48) B 21 (35) 18 (33) C 2 (3) 6 (11) D 5 (8) 2 (4) E 5 (8) 2 (4) Control Pain Episodes A 9 (15) 8 (15) B 32 (52) 28 (52) C 15 (24) 14 (25) D 5 (8) 3 (6) E 0 1 (2) Hospitalizations A 13 (21) 12 (22) B 33 (54) 29 (54) C 12 (20) 10 (19) D 3 (5) 2 (4) E 0 1 (2) Need/Use Medications A 20 (33) 18 (33) B 28 (46) 26 (48) C 9 (15) 7 (13) D 2 (3) 2 (4) E 2 (3) 1 (2) Disease Outcome A 7 (11) 6 (11) B 34 (55) 34 (62) C 10 (16) 9 (17) D 9 (16) 4 (8) E 1 (2) 1 (2) A=Very B=Somewhat C=Not Very D=Not at All E= Not sure. * Patients without. ACP ** Patients without ACP that completed visit 2. We conclude that the majority of adult SCD patients studied do not have written advance directives (87%). This represents a large proportion of patients with chronic illness and high health services utilization but with unknown ACP wishes. About half (46%) of patients report having specific wishes about medical treatment if becoming very ill while an equal number are unsure, which shows a dichotomy regarding self-identified ACP decision making. There is a need for increasing SCD patient awareness and use of ACP. Further studies will help define how to address this need in SCD and similar chronically ill populations Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lilei完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
狂跳的脉搏完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1234完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
整齐的大开完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
欧蓝德man完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
alandan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Hao完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
Zikc完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
denisewang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
一人完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
xishanju完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
西红柿完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
JamesPei的应助被NATURECATCHER采纳,获得10
4秒前
积极从蕾发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
dde的应助被罐罐采纳,获得10
4秒前
微笑傲柏完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
熊大完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
好吃的小米完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
痕墨笙发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
薇子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
7秒前
小高完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
共享精神的应助被solar@2030采纳,获得10
7秒前
正直的雨双完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
嗯我就不说完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Chris完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
风趣的扬青完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
destiny完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
雷德完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
无奈尔曼发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
雪球汤姆完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
LV完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被封尘逸动采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
风清扬完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Aspects of Post-SPE Phonology 2000
CODESSA Version 2.13 for Windows 2000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Berberine regulates the TLR4 signaling pathway to suppress hypoxia-induced proliferation and migration of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells 520
Organizational Behavior 510
A Concise Course in Continuum Mechanics 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 化学工程 内科学 物理 生物化学 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 人工智能 心理学 无机化学 基因 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7847216
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9367315
关于积分的说明 20654325
捐赠科研通 7443951
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3341979
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2485896
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2364886