Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.

心理学 压力源 荟萃分析 压力(语言学) 失调家庭 前额叶皮质 社会心理学 临床心理学 发展心理学 认知 精神科 医学 语言学 内科学 哲学
作者
Katrin Starcke,Matthias Brand
出处
期刊:Psychological Bulletin [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:142 (9): 909-933 被引量:234
标识
DOI:10.1037/bul0000060
摘要

(see record 2016-39486-001). It should have been reported that the inverted u-shaped relationship between cortisol stress responses and decision-making performance was only observed in female, but not in male participants as suggested by the study by van den Bos, Harteveld, and Stoop (2009). Corrected versions of the affected sentences are provided.] The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to quantify the effects that stress has on decisions made under uncertainty. We hypothesized that stress increases reward seeking and risk taking through alterations of dopamine firing rates and reduces executive control by hindering optimal prefrontal cortex functioning. In certain decision situations, increased reward seeking and risk taking is dysfunctional, whereas in others, this is not the case. We also assumed that the type of stressor plays a role. In addition, moderating variables are analyzed, such as the hormonal stress response, the time between stress onset and decisions, and the participants' age and gender. We included studies in the meta-analysis that investigated decision making after a laboratory stress-induction versus a control condition (k = 32 datasets, N = 1829 participants). A random-effects model revealed that overall, stress conditions lead to decisions that can be described as more disadvantageous, more reward seeking, and more risk taking than nonstress conditions (d = .17). In those situations in which increased reward seeking and risk taking is disadvantageous, stress had significant effects (d = .26), whereas in other situations, no effects were observed (d = .01). Effects were observed under processive stressors (d = .19), but not under systemic ones (d = .09). Moderation analyses did not reveal any significant results. We concluded that stress deteriorates overall decision-making performance through the mechanisms proposed. The effects differ, depending on the decision situation and the type of stressor, but not on the characteristics of the individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
red完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
CipherSage应助TianY天翊采纳,获得10
2秒前
顾矜应助满意时光采纳,获得10
2秒前
科研通AI6.4应助恒弟弟采纳,获得10
2秒前
美满熊猫完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
周周完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
丹丹子完成签到 ,获得积分0
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
yjh123应助拥抱黑暗吧采纳,获得50
3秒前
顺利舟应助淡然枫采纳,获得10
3秒前
深情安青应助还来得及采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
852应助蓝天采纳,获得10
4秒前
二一七完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助有点意思采纳,获得10
4秒前
王华完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
李健应助李健课题组采纳,获得10
5秒前
无限凝竹发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
加菲丰丰重新开启了abc文献应助
5秒前
谷粱初晴发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
syy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
念烟完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xiaolizi发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
JINCHANG完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
wu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
monoklatt发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
Dynamische Polarisation von H-1 und B-11 in (CH-3)-3NBH-3 500
CLSI M07 2024 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7248275
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8871254
关于积分的说明 18716482
捐赠科研通 6927344
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3198293
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2373888
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2173046