Effects of stress on decisions under uncertainty: A meta-analysis.

心理学 压力源 荟萃分析 压力(语言学) 失调家庭 前额叶皮质 社会心理学 临床心理学 发展心理学 认知 精神科 医学 语言学 内科学 哲学
作者
Katrin Starcke,Matthias Brand
出处
期刊:Psychological Bulletin [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:142 (9): 909-933 被引量:234
标识
DOI:10.1037/bul0000060
摘要

(see record 2016-39486-001). It should have been reported that the inverted u-shaped relationship between cortisol stress responses and decision-making performance was only observed in female, but not in male participants as suggested by the study by van den Bos, Harteveld, and Stoop (2009). Corrected versions of the affected sentences are provided.] The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to quantify the effects that stress has on decisions made under uncertainty. We hypothesized that stress increases reward seeking and risk taking through alterations of dopamine firing rates and reduces executive control by hindering optimal prefrontal cortex functioning. In certain decision situations, increased reward seeking and risk taking is dysfunctional, whereas in others, this is not the case. We also assumed that the type of stressor plays a role. In addition, moderating variables are analyzed, such as the hormonal stress response, the time between stress onset and decisions, and the participants' age and gender. We included studies in the meta-analysis that investigated decision making after a laboratory stress-induction versus a control condition (k = 32 datasets, N = 1829 participants). A random-effects model revealed that overall, stress conditions lead to decisions that can be described as more disadvantageous, more reward seeking, and more risk taking than nonstress conditions (d = .17). In those situations in which increased reward seeking and risk taking is disadvantageous, stress had significant effects (d = .26), whereas in other situations, no effects were observed (d = .01). Effects were observed under processive stressors (d = .19), but not under systemic ones (d = .09). Moderation analyses did not reveal any significant results. We concluded that stress deteriorates overall decision-making performance through the mechanisms proposed. The effects differ, depending on the decision situation and the type of stressor, but not on the characteristics of the individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
guoanhong发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
王誉霖发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小汪快跑完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
JunpengGuo发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小方发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
遂芫人生完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
SYX发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
领导范儿应助李达康采纳,获得10
5秒前
77发布了新的文献求助100
5秒前
AY完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
大胆的冰之完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
soapffz完成签到,获得积分0
7秒前
提拉米苏发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
震动的绿竹完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
852应助锅锅采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
11秒前
小二郎应助TCB采纳,获得10
11秒前
乐乐应助蛋挞狂粉小土豆采纳,获得10
11秒前
科研通AI2S应助谦让元槐采纳,获得10
12秒前
汉堡包应助chi采纳,获得10
12秒前
善始善终完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
eric完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
雾夹尘完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
博格巴完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
斐波那契完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
悦耳的颤发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
SYX完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
李达康发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
大陈完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
阳光的醉香完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
20秒前
幽默囧发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
cherleen发布了新的文献求助40
21秒前
小方发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
充电宝应助晚风采纳,获得10
22秒前
JunpengGuo发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Reading and Understanding Health Research 500
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
Dynamische Polarisation von H-1 und B-11 in (CH-3)-3NBH-3 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7251359
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8873897
关于积分的说明 18729930
捐赠科研通 6931105
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3199375
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2374325
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2173997