体外
免疫荧光
细胞外
诱导剂
脂多糖
分子生物学
化学
染色
巨噬细胞
间接免疫荧光
男科
生物化学
免疫学
生物
抗体
医学
基因
遗传学
作者
Chengcheng Su,Guoan Xiang,Yongqiang Ma,Yidan Zhang,Xin Zhou,Shouchun Peng,Luqing Wei,Wenjie Ji
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2016-04-01
卷期号:32 (4): 466-9
摘要
To compare the different methods of inducing the formation of macrophage extracellular trap (MET) in vitro.MET release was initiated by culturing RAW264.7 cells with 0.5, 1, 5, 10 μg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or 10, 25, 50, 80 μmol/L phorbolmyristate acetate (PMA), or 50, 100, 150 μg/mL silicon dioxide (SiO2). Three and 6 hours later, MET were validated by immunofluorescence staining, followed by immunofluorescence-based semi-quantitative analysis.Immunofluorescence staining showed that the network structures were mainly composed of DNA and histones. RAW264.7 cells treated with 1 μg/mL LPS for 6 hours produced the highest percent of MET [(37.04±10.02)%], which was statistically higher compared with control group [(7.90±2.71)%]. RAW264.7 cells treated with 80 μmol/L PMA for 6 hours also produced the higher percent of MET [(22.40±1.83)%] compared with control group [(10.11±1.13)%]. However, there was no significantly increased MET formation in cells treated with SiO2 compared with control group.LPS and PMA can induce MET formation in vitro, while SiO2 was not efficient inducer.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI