Single‐operator peroral cholangioscope in treating difficult biliary stones: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

医学 荟萃分析 不利影响 随机对照试验 科克伦图书馆 置信区间 梅德林 胆管 出版偏见 内科学 外科 政治学 法学
作者
Zheng Jin,Yaping Wei,Xiaowei Tang,Sisi Shen,Jing Yang,Hangbin Jin,Xiaofeng Zhang
出处
期刊:Digestive Endoscopy [Wiley]
卷期号:31 (3): 256-269 被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1111/den.13307
摘要

Background and Aim Current evidence supporting the utility of single‐operator peroral cholangioscope ( SOPOC ) in the management of difficult bile duct stones is limited. We conducted the present systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOPOC in treating difficult bile duct stones. Methods We searched studies up to April 2018, using MEDLINE , EMBASE , the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Quality assessment of the studies was completed with the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. Main outcomes were complete stone clearance rate, single‐session stone clearance rate, number of endoscopic sessions needed for stone clearance, and adverse events. We calculated the pooled estimates with random‐effects models. Potential publication bias was assessed. Results Twenty‐four studies involving 2786 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled proportion of patients with complete stone clearance was 94.3% (95% confidence interval [95% CI ]: 90.2–97.5%). Single‐session stone clearance was achieved in 71.1% (95% CI : 62.1–79.5%) of the pooled patients. Pooled number of sessions needed for stone clearance was 1.26 (95% CI : 1.17–1.34%). Pooled adverse event rate was 6.1% (95% CI : 3.8–8.7%). Potential publication bias was detected but had no significant influence on the results. Conclusions Single‐operator peroral cholangioscope is an effective and safe treatment for difficult bile duct stones when conventional methods have failed. More randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm the results.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
雯子完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Vicou2025完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
oppoaply发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
云瑾完成签到,获得积分0
1秒前
2秒前
椰子完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Cly940815发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
852应助piaopiao1122采纳,获得10
3秒前
wuxiaoyan426发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小确幸发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
雪峰发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
帅肚完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
赵yh完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
YJY完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
赛特新思完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
乐观保温杯完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Wcy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
乐乐应助典雅寒风采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
淡定如芳发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
学术小白发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
钙离子完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
上官若男应助辛勤的梦菲采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7745837
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9293714
关于积分的说明 20221401
捐赠科研通 7325384
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307939
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459916
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2319291