德尔菲法
文档
德尔菲
质量(理念)
相关性(法律)
最佳实践
医学
梅德林
工作(物理)
护理部
心理学
计算机科学
政治学
工程类
机械工程
哲学
认识论
人工智能
法学
程序设计语言
操作系统
作者
Kaitlyn Tate,Sarah Lee,Brian H. Rowe,Garnet Cummings,Jayna Holroyd‐Leduc,R. Colin Reid,Rowan El‐Bialy,Jeffrey A. Bakal,Carole A. Estabrooks,Carol L. Anderson,Greta G. Cummings
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0714980820000446
摘要
Abstract We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons’ transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back. Through two Delphi survey rounds, experts ranked relevance, feasibility, and scientific soundness of QIs. A steering committee reviewed QIs for their feasible capture in Canadian administrative databases. Our search yielded 326 QIs from 53 sources. A final set of 38 feasible indicators to measure in current practice was included. The highest proportions of indicators were for the emergency department (47%) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domain of effectiveness (39.5%). Most feasible indicators were outcome indicators. Our work highlights a lack of standardized transition QI development in practice, and the limitations of current free-text documentation systems in capturing relevant and consistent data.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI