医学
耐受性
随机化
恶心
胃肠病学
PEG比率
不利影响
内科学
随机对照试验
外科
财务
经济
作者
Jin Hwa Park,Seung Wook Hong,Sung Wook Hwang,Sang Hyoung Park,Dong‐Hoon Yang,Byong Duk Ye,Seung‐Jae Myung,Suk‐Kyun Yang,Jeong‐Sik Byeon
摘要
Abstract Background and Aim Low‐volume bowel preparation solutions, including 1‐L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (PEG‐A), have been developed to improve tolerability. The oral sodium sulfate tablet (OST) is a new agent with simethicone as a preloaded component. We investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of OST compared to 1‐L PEG‐A. Methods A single‐center, prospective, controlled study was performed with randomization into the OST (group A) and 1‐L PEG‐A (group B) groups. Bowel preparation efficacy was assessed on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and Bubble Scale. Safety and tolerability were evaluated using a questionnaire and laboratory examination. Results Final analysis was performed on 171 patients (group A: 87, group B: 84). The proportion of bowel preparation success (BBPS ≥ 2 for each colonic segment) in group A was not inferior compared to group B (95.4% vs 96.4%, P = 0.736, 1‐sided 97.5% lower confidence limit −7.0%). The adenoma detection rate was not different (59.6% vs 41.9%; P = 0.087). The bubble scale was better in group A (0.2 ± 0.9 vs 1.9 ± 1.7, P < 0.001). All adverse events were mild in both groups. Nausea was less frequent in group A (14.9% vs 38.1%, P = 0.001). Overall satisfaction was better in group A (8.1 ± 2.1 vs 6.4 ± 2.8, P < 0.001). No clinically significant laboratory abnormality developed in both groups. These findings were similarly shown in old patients ≥65 years. Conclusions Both OST and 1‐L PEG‐A were efficacious, safe, and tolerable for bowel preparation of colonoscopy. The OST showed fewer bubbles and slightly better tolerability.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI