语义学
伪装
捕食
水晶
生物
生态学
捕食者
背景(考古学)
自然选择
昆虫
选择(遗传算法)
计算机科学
人工智能
古生物学
作者
Iliana Medina,Alice Exnerová,Klára Daňková,Olivier Penacchio,Thomas N. Sherratt,Tomáš Albrecht,Sarika Baidya,Renan Janke Bosque,Harold E. Brown,Emily Burdfield‐Steel,Kristal E. Cain,Rodrigo Roucourt Cezário,Ylenia Chiari,Carolina Esquivel,Rhainer Guillermo Nascimento Ferreira,Amanda M. Franklin,Aloise Garvey,Samuel Guchu,Brandon T. Hastings,Kateřina Hotová-Svádová
出处
期刊:Science
[American Association for the Advancement of Science]
日期:2025-09-25
卷期号:389 (6767): 1336-1341
标识
DOI:10.1126/science.adr7368
摘要
Natural selection has repeatedly led to the evolution of two alternative antipredator color strategies—camouflage to avoid detection and aposematism to advertise unprofitability—but we lack understanding of how ecological context favors one strategy over the other. We conducted a globally replicated predation experiment at 21 sites on six continents to test how predator community, prey community, and visual environment influenced the predation risk of 15,018 artificial paper “moth” prey with cryptic or warning coloration. Results indicated that aposematic strategies fare better in environments with low predation intensity, whereas camouflage strategies are advantaged when other camouflaged prey species are rare and when light levels are low. This study demonstrates how multiple mechanisms shape antipredator strategies, helping to explain the evolution and global distribution of camouflaged and aposematic animals.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI