医学
倾向得分匹配
危险系数
回顾性队列研究
内科学
队列
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
置信区间
队列研究
比例危险模型
急诊医学
疾病
传染病(医学专业)
作者
Zixin Shu,Kai Chang,Yana Zhou,Chaoan Peng,Xugui Li,Wei Cai,Wei Li,Qiguang Zheng,Haoyu Tian,Jianan Xia,Kuo Yang,Ning Wang,Jifen Liu,Xiaojun Min,Dengying Yan,Jing Sun,Huan Wu,Xiaomeng Li,Yi Zheng,Zecong Yu
标识
DOI:10.1142/s0192415x21500257
摘要
Chinese medicine (CM) was extensively used to treat COVID-19 in China. We aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of add-on semi-individualized CM during the outbreak. A retrospective cohort of 1788 adult confirmed COVID-19 patients were recruited from 2235 consecutive linked records retrieved from five hospitals in Wuhan during 15 January to 13 March 2020. The mortality of add-on semi-individualized CM users and non-users was compared by inverse probability weighted hazard ratio (HR) and by propensity score matching. Change of biomarkers was compared between groups, and the frequency of CMs used was analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed to stratify disease severity and dose of CM exposure. The crude mortality was 3.8% in the semi-individualized CM user group and 17.0% among the non-users. Add-on CM was associated with a mortality reduction of 58% (HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.77, [Formula: see text] = 0.005) among all COVID-19 cases and 66% (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.76, [Formula: see text] = 0.009) among severe/critical COVID-19 cases demonstrating dose-dependent response, after inversely weighted with propensity score. The result was robust in various stratified, weighted, matched, adjusted and sensitivity analyses. Severe/critical patients that received add-on CM had a trend of stabilized D-dimer level after 3–7 days of admission when compared to baseline. Immunomodulating and anti-asthmatic CMs were most used. Add-on semi-individualized CM was associated with significantly reduced mortality, especially among severe/critical cases. Chinese medicine could be considered as an add-on regimen for trial use.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI