医学
菌血症
相对风险
血液透析
内科学
抗菌剂
置信区间
抗生素
子群分析
入射(几何)
重症监护医学
荟萃分析
导管
外科
微生物学
物理
光学
生物
作者
Sohail Abdul Salim,Ahmed Taher Masoud,Charat Thongprayoon,Wisit Cheungpasitporn,Karim Soliman,Vishnu Garla,Ahmed Adel Sofy,Ahmed Saeed Ahmed,Ahmed Taha Abdelsattar,Lajos Zsom,Mihály Tapolyai,Tibor Fülöp
出处
期刊:Asaio Journal
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2021-02-09
卷期号:67 (10): 1079-1086
被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1097/mat.0000000000001382
摘要
Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) with hemodialysis catheters are associated with increased mortality, morbidity and pose significant financial burden on healthcare. Antibiotic and antimicrobial locking solutions are effective in reducing risk of CRBSI. From inception to April 2020, we looked for relevant clinical controlled trials throughout the following databases: EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, clinicaltrial.gov, and Google Scholar performing a metanalysis comparing antibiotic and antimicrobial lock solutions to heparin. Twenty-six studies with 4,967 patients reported the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia (CRB). The overall pooled risk ratio (RR) showed that the intervention group was associated with a significantly lower incidence of CRB by 30% compared with heparin (RR = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.25, 0.36], p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that administration of antibiotic regimens led to a decreased risk of CRB episodes by 28% compared with the heparin group (RR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.21, 0.37], p < 0.0001). Antimicrobial solutions was associated with reduced risk of CRB by 32% compared with patients of the control group (RR = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.41], p < 0.0001). A test of subgroup differences was revealed no significant favoring of any of the two interventions. Both antibiotic and antimicrobial solutions are effective in reducing CRBSI.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI