计算机科学
程序设计语言
第五代程序设计语言
第一代程序设计语言
归纳程序设计
可视化程序设计语言
非常高级的编程语言
程序设计范式
计算机程序设计
作者
Hidekuni Tsukamoto,Yasuhiro Takemura,Yasumasa Oomori,Isamu Ikeda,Hideo Nagumo,Akito Monden,Kenichi Matsumoto
出处
期刊:Frontiers in Education Conference
日期:2016-10-01
卷期号:: 1-7
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1109/fie.2016.7757571
摘要
The purpose of this research is to compare textual programming languages and visual programming languages from the aspect of motivation. As a textual programming language, Processing programming language was used, and as visual programming languages, Scratch, a derivation of Scratch, Teaching materials offered by code.org, and LEGO Mindstorms EV3 were used. Teaching materials using the textual programming language, and those using the visual programming languages were developed separately. A trial experiment of programming education with the textual programming language was conducted to a cohort of seven primary schoolchildren. Trial experiments with the visual programming languages were conducted twice. In each of them, a cohort of eight primary schoolchildren participated. The motivation of the children was assessed using the questionnaire based on the ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction) motivation model. The results with the visual programming languages suggested that the motivation scores of the children increased as the class progressed when visual programming languages were used. On the other hand, the results with Processing suggested that the variance of Satisfaction factor increased as the class progressed when textual programming languages were used, which further suggested that the Satisfaction scores of the children spread as the class progressed when textual programming languages were used.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI