医学
麻醉
随机对照试验
刺激
不利影响
置信区间
三叉神经
临床试验
神经调节
迷走神经电刺激
脉搏(音乐)
铅(地质)
经皮神经电刺激
微分效应
枕神经刺激
作者
Aldo Alberto Conti,Natali S. Bozhilova,Irem Ece Eraydin,Dominic Stringer,Lena C. Johansson,Robert Marhenke,Andrea Bilbow,Sahid El Masri,Joshua Hyde,Giovanni Giaroli,Holan Liang,Federico Fiori,Mitul Ashok Mehta,Paramala Santosh,Ben Carter,Samuele Cortese,Katya Rubia
出处
期刊:Nature Medicine
[Nature Portfolio]
日期:2026-01-16
卷期号:32 (2): 582-590
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1038/s41591-025-04075-x
摘要
Abstract External trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) received FDA clearance in 2019 as the first device-based, non-pharmacological treatment for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), based on a small pilot sham-controlled randomized controlled trial (RCT) that reported symptom improvement in 62 children with ADHD. We conducted a confirmatory multi-centre, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel-group, phase IIb RCT investigating short and longer-term efficacy (6 months) of real vs sham TNS in 150 children and adolescents with ADHD. Partricipants were randomized to receive real TNS ( n =75, mean age [ SD ]= 12.6 [2.8 years]), or sham TNS ( n =75, mean age [ SD ]= 12.6 [2.8 years]), nightly for 4 weeks. Bilateral stimulation targeted V1 trigeminal branches using battery-powered electrodes applied to the forehead for ~9 hours/night. Sham TNS delivered 30 seconds of stimulation per hour at a lower frequency. Intention to treat analysis (ITT) showed no significant differential treatment effects on ADHD symptoms (estimated adjusted mean difference [ aMD ] = 0.83; 95% Confidence interval [CI] = –2.47 to 4.13; p = 0.622; Cohen’s d = 0.09). No differential treatment effects were observed either on the secondary outcomes covering other symptom scales of ADHD and related clinical problems, as well as cognitive and physiological outcomes, except for a small reduction in mind wandering favouring real TNS ( aMD = –2.17; 95% CI = –4.33 to –0.01; p = 0.049; Cohen’s d = –0.27). Adherence was 94% and compliance 93%. Blinding was successful. No serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported, and side effects did not differ between groups. In conclusion, TNS is a safe intervention but does not demonstrate clinical efficacy for paediatric ADHD. Trial registration: ISRCTN82129325.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI