Comparison of anaerobic speed reserve and maximal aerobic speed methods to prescribe short format high‐intensity interval training

The purpose of the study was to compare the degree of intersubject variability in the cardiorespiratory, metabolic, and perceptual responses to high‐intensity interval training (HIIT) prescribed based on the relative anaerobic speed reserve (ASR) or maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and to identify the optimal % ASR for execution of such HIIT. Seventeen male physical education students (age: 23.6 ± 1.1 years, height: 180.2 ± 5.9, body mass: 78.3 ± 8.1 kg; % body fat: 14.3 ± 2.7%) volunteered to execute three randomly scheduled 10‐min HIIT exercises at 110% vVO 2max , Δ15% ASR, or Δ25% ASR. Analysis of variance for repeated measures and the least significant difference post‐hoc test were used to compare the physiological responses and the mean of individual residuals between the training sessions. The coefficients of variation (CV) of time spent ≥90% of maximal oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) and maximal heart rate (HR max ), peak VO 2 , mean VO 2 , peak HR, mean HR, blood lactate [La], and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were 48.7%, 35.9%, 9.3%, 7%, 3.5%, 4.8%, 32%, and 16.9% during 110% vVO 2max , 47.2%, 31%, 7.5%, 6.7%, 3.9%, 4.6%, 24.2%, and 14.6% during Δ15% ASR, and 48.1%, 31.5%, 7.6%, 8.4%, 3.6%, 4.1%, 20.2%, and 3.4% during Δ25% ASR session, respectively. Only the residuals in RPE were significantly ( p < 0.001) higher in 110% vVO 2max and Δ15% ASR in comparison to Δ25% ASR. Time spent ≥90% HR max /VO 2max was maximized during Δ15% ASR session, albeit this was not significantly different from other sessions. The ASR‐based method leads to reduced CVs of physiological and perceptual responses during 10‐min HIIT; however, only reductions in [La] and RPE may be considered practically meaningful. Practitioners can use vVO 2max for prescription of 10‐min HIIT session comprised of 15‐s work and passive recovery intervals.