医学
照顾负担
生活质量(医疗保健)
急诊科
家庭照顾者
抑郁症状
日常生活活动
广义估计方程
医疗保健
老年学
物理疗法
精神科
痴呆
焦虑
疾病
护理部
内科学
统计
数学
经济增长
经济
作者
Courtney H. Van Houtven,Karen M. Stechuchak,Paul A. Dennis,Kasey Decosimo,Chelsea Whitfield,Nina Sperber,Susan N. Hastings,Megan Shepherd‐Banigan,Brystana G. Kaufman,Valerie A. Smith
摘要
Abstract Background Time in healthcare facilities is associated with worse patient quality of life (QoL); however, impact on family caregiver QoL is unknown. We evaluate care recipient days not at home—days in the emergency department (ED), inpatient (IP) care, and post‐acute care (PAC)—to understand how care recipient days not at home correspond to family caregiver QoL. Methods Secondary data were linked to care recipient utilization data. Elastic net machine learning models were used to evaluate the impact of a single day of utilization in each setting on binary QoL outcomes. We also compared composite weighted and unweighted “days not at home” variables. Two time periods, 6 and 18 months, were used to predict three caregiver QoL measures (self‐rated health, depressive symptoms, and subjective burden). Results In the 6‐month timeframe, a single day of ED utilization was associated with increased likelihood of poor QoL for all three assessed outcomes (range: 1.4%–3.2%). A day of PAC was associated to a modest degree with increased likelihood of caregiver burden (0.2%) and depressive symptoms (0.1%), with a slight protective effect for self‐rated health (−0.1%). An IP day had a slight protective effect (−0.2 to −0.1%). At 18 months, ED and IP had similar, albeit more muted, relationships with caregiver burden and depressive symptoms. PAC had a slight protective effect for caregiver burden (−0.1%). Cumulative days in all settings combined generally was not associated with caregiver QoL. Conclusion Whereas total care recipient time away from home had some negative spillovers to family caregivers, the countervailing effects of unique settings on caregiver QoL may mask net QoL effects. This finding limits the utility of a single care recipient home time measure as a valid caregiver‐centered measure. Considering cumulative care recipient time in individual settings separately may be needed to reveal the true net effects on caregiver QoL.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI