Virtual scale endoscope vs snares for size measurement accuracy of smaller colorectal polyps: A randomized controlled trial

医学 结肠镜检查 随机对照试验 内窥镜 内窥镜检查 虚拟大肠镜 外科 内科学 胃肠病学 结直肠癌 癌症
作者
Roupen Djinbachian,Mahsa Taghiakbari,Abla Alj,Edgard Medawar,Sacha Sidani,Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow,Benoît Panzini,Mikael Bouin,Daniel von Renteln
出处
期刊:Endoscopy [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1055/a-2475-0244
摘要

Background and aims: Accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial for informing clinical decisions such as resection techniques and surveillance scheduling. This study aimed to compare polyp size measurement accuracy when using a virtual scale endoscope (VSE) or snare-based polyp size measurement. Methods: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 221 patients undergoing screening, surveillance or diagnostic outpatient colonoscopies. Study subjects were randomized to have detected polyps measured for size either using VSE or a snare of known size to estimate the size of each polyp during the colonoscopy. All polyps were measured for reference size directly after their removal from the colon using a digital caliper and before formalin fixation. Results: 93 polyps were included in the VSE group and 102 in the Snare group. VSE demonstrated significantly higher relative accuracy (80.0% [95% CI: 77.0-82.9]) compared to snare-based size estimation (66.4% [95% CI: 62.4-70.5]; p<0.0001). Misclassification rates were lower with VSE for polyps >2mm (13.1% vs. 39.3%) and >3mm (22.6% vs. 55.4%). For diminutive polyps, VSE better prevented misclassification of >5mm polyps as 1-5 mm (21.4% vs. 73.0%). VSE also outperformed snare in measuring within 10% of reference standard size (30.1% vs. 18.6%) and had lower rates of size underestimation (36.5% vs. 65.7%). Conclusions: Using VSE improves polyp size measurement accuracy during colonoscopy in comparison with snare-based size estimation. In clinical scenarios, VSE reduced misclassifications at clinically relevant size thresholds 2,3 and 5mm which is relevant for adequate choice of polypectomy techniques or when implementing resect and discard strategies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
追逐梦想的打工人完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
心态好应助文静的又琴采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
西部小田发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
小小小肃啊完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
斯文败类应助新小pi采纳,获得20
5秒前
Nole应助不吃辣椒采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
FFBBD完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
11完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
bkagyin应助淇淇采纳,获得10
10秒前
科研通AI6.4应助海燕采纳,获得10
12秒前
13秒前
陳.发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
16秒前
云曦完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
18秒前
陳.完成签到 ,获得积分20
18秒前
19秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助ddddddddddd采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
虚幻寄凡发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
充电宝应助AAA采纳,获得10
24秒前
淇淇发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
hehe发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
慕青应助爱撒娇的长颈鹿采纳,获得10
25秒前
26秒前
scl发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
海燕发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
28秒前
30秒前
涛1118发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
32秒前
上官若男应助zoro采纳,获得10
33秒前
zc完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
立体发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
34秒前
35秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Reducing Compassion Fatigue, Secondary Traumatic Stress and Burnout 600
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Mammalian Synthetic Biology 500
Auslegungsgeschichte 500
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7639066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9212206
关于积分的说明 19761593
捐赠科研通 7205836
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3275955
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2437529
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2273219