基因组
生物反应器
无氧运动
微生物学
抗生素耐药性
生化工程
生物技术
生物
工程类
抗生素
基因
生理学
生物化学
植物
作者
Julie Sanchez Medina,Shuo Zhang,Shaman Narayanasamy,Changzhi Wang,Bothayna Al-Gashgari,Pei‐Ying Hong
标识
DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c10879
摘要
Sludge is a biohazardous solid waste that is produced during wastewater treatment. It contains antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) that pose significant antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threats. Herein, aerobic and anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AeMBRs and AnMBRs, respectively) were compared in terms of the volume of waste sludge generated by them, the presence of ARGs in the sludge, and the potential for horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events using metagenomics to determine which treatment process can better address AMR concerns associated with the generation of waste sludge. The estimated abundance of ARGs in the suspended sludge generated by the AnMBR per treated volume is, on average, 5–55 times lower than that of sludge generated by the AeMBR. Additionally, the ratio of potential HGT in the two independent runs was lower in the anaerobic sludge (0.6 and 0.9) compared with that in the aerobic sludge (2.4 and 1.6). The AnMBR sludge exhibited reduced HGT of ARGs involving potential opportunistic pathogens (0.09) compared with the AeMBR sludge (0.27). Conversely, the AeMBR sludge displayed higher diversity and more transfer events, encompassing genes that confer resistance to quinolones, rifamycin, multidrug, aminoglycosides, and tetracycline. A significant portion of these ARGs were transferred to Burkholderia sp. By contrast, the AnMBR showed a lower abundance of mobile genetic elements associated with conjugation and exhibited less favorable conditions for natural transformation. Our findings suggest that the risk of potential HGT to opportunistic pathogens is greater in the AeMBR sludge than in AnMBR sludge.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI