普遍性(动力系统)
工作(物理)
锂(药物)
电池(电)
采暖系统
离子
核工程
电流(流体)
功率(物理)
计算机科学
材料科学
工艺工程
化学
机械工程
热力学
工程类
物理
内分泌学
有机化学
医学
量子力学
作者
Haijun Ruan,Jorge Varela Barreras,Marco Steinhardt,Andreas Jossen,Gregory J. Offer,Billy Wu
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233484
摘要
Lithium-ion batteries at low temperatures have slow recharge times alongside reduced available power and energy. Battery heating is a viable way to address this issue, and self-heating techniques are appealing due to acceptable efficiency and speed. However, there are a lack of studies quantitatively comparing self-heating methods rather than qualitatively, because of the existence of many different batteries with varied heating parameters. In this work, we review the current state-of-the-art self-heating methods and propose the heating triangle as a new quantitative indicator for comparing self-heating methods, towards identifying/developing effective heating approaches. We define the heating triangle which considers three fundamental metrics: the specific heating rate (°C·g·J−1), coefficient of performance (COP) (−), and specific temperature difference (°C·hr), enabling a quantitative assessment of self-heating methods using data reported in the literature. Our analysis demonstrates that very similar metrics are observed for the same type of self-heating method, irrespective of the study case, supporting the universality of the proposed indicator. With the comparison insights, we identify research gaps and new avenues for developing advanced self-heating methods. This work demonstrates the value of the proposed heating triangle as a standardised approach to compare heating methods and drive innovation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI