Homoeopathic eye drops in the treatment of mild-to-moderate dry eye disease: Randomised, prospective, multicentre, single-masked study

医学 不利影响 可视模拟标度 前瞻性队列研究 人造眼泪 瘙痒的 眼药水 角膜 眼科 外科 内科学
作者
B. Mortemousque,Pisella Pj,N. Salaun,N. Lemaire,I. Chanel
出处
期刊:European Journal of Ophthalmology [SAGE Publishing]
标识
DOI:10.1177/11206721231216129
摘要

To compare the efficacy and safety of a homeopathic eye drop medicinal product (Homeoptic®) with 0.9% sodium hydrochloride eye drops (Larmabak®) in patients with mild-to-moderate dry eye disease (DED).Prospective, single-masked, observer-blinded, multicentre study on adult patients. Non-inferiority primary endpoint of the relative change between treatment groups in a composite Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score covering five symptoms of DED, namely pain, itching, sensation of dry eye, impression of foreign body presence and burning, after 30 days of treatment. Details of all Adverse Events (AEs) were recorded and analysed.Ninety three patients were randomised to each treatment arm. At Day 30, the mean VAS symptom score was 26.0 ± 18.8 in the Homeoptic® group and 32.8 ± 21.2 Larmabak® group. Homeoptic® was demonstrated to be non-inferior to Larmabak®: the mean treatment difference of -7 being below the 10 mm upper limit of the 95% CI ([-12.9; -1.0]) pre-set as significant. The superiority of Homeoptic® over Larmabak® was then established with detection of a significant difference between the two treatment groups (p = 0.022). Significant differences between the treatment groups in favour of Homeoptic® were also detected in isolated VAS scores for the symptoms dry eye sensation (p = 0.009) and burning (p = 0.004). Results of ocular surface staining tests to estimate corneal and conjunctival damage as well as patient satisfaction were also significantly in favour of Homeoptic®. No new safety concerns were identified.Homeoptic® is more effective than Larmabak® at relieving the symptoms of DED and constitutes an effective treatment for mild-to-moderate DED.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Stephen完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
SciGPT的应助被jiojio采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
wanci的应助被大力的源智采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
高高秋珊发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
yar发布了新的文献求助80
7秒前
Owen的应助被自然自行车采纳,获得10
8秒前
勤劳的晟睿完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
一颗苹果关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
luminous发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
危机的夏兰完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被ask采纳,获得10
11秒前
Lydia发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
等待凡英发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
踏实威完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Tungsten关注了科研通微信公众号
17秒前
欣喜安蕾完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
多拉贡来了完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
脑洞疼的应助被theverve采纳,获得30
23秒前
24秒前
阳光的寻琴完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
我是老大的应助被humble采纳,获得10
24秒前
搜集达人的应助被等待凡英采纳,获得10
25秒前
哈哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
SMION发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
苦无完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
还我小小嘴完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
饭团发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
29秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 1: A–B 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7818701
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9346803
关于积分的说明 20537769
捐赠科研通 7411269
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3332081
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2478266
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2351826