Randomized clinical trial on D2 lymphadenectomy versus D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastric excision in patients undergoing gastrectomy for cancer (DCGC01 study)

医学 淋巴结切除术 四分位间距 胃切除术 外科 临床终点 癌症 随机对照试验 内科学
作者
Daxing Xie,Jie Shen,Liang Liu,Bangrong Cao,Aitang Xiao,Jianbing Qin,Jianhong Wu,Qun Yan,Yuanlong Hu,Chuanyong Yang,Chen Wang,Junbo Hu,Ping Yin,Jianping Gong
出处
期刊:British Journal of Surgery 卷期号:111 (5)
标识
DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae106
摘要

Abstract Background It is unknown whether D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision for gastric cancer improves survival compared with just D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods Between September 2014 and June 2018, patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to laparoscopic D2 lymphadenectomy or D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision gastrectomy. The modified intention-to-treat population was defined as patients who had pathologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (pT1 N1–3 M0 and pT2–4 N0–3 M0). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were the recurrence pattern and overall survival. Results The median follow-up of patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (169 patients) and patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy +complete mesogastric excision group (169 patients) was 55 (interquartile range 37–60) months and 51 (interquartile range 40–60) months respectively. Recurrence occurred in 50 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy group (29.6%) versus 33 patients in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (19.5%) (P = 0.032). The 3-year disease-free survival was 75.5% (95% c.i. 68.3% to 81.3%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.0% (95% c.i. 78.7% to 89.6%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.042). The HR for recurrence in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 0.99) by Cox regression (P = 0.045). The 3-year overall survival rate was 77.5% (95% c.i. 70.4% to 83.1%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy group versus 85.8% (95% c.i. 79.6% to 90.2%) in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group (log rank P = 0.058). The HR for death in the D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision group versus the D2 lymphadenectomy group was 0.64 (95% c.i. 0.41 to 1.02) (P = 0.058). Conclusion Compared with conventional D2 dissection, D2 lymphadenectomy + complete mesogastric excision is associated with better disease-free survival, but there is no statistically significant difference in overall survival. Registration number NCT01978444 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
不倦应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
我是老大应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
王肥肥完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
8秒前
研友_ZAe4qZ完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
彩色菲鹰完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
木木发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
慕青应助阿谭采纳,获得10
9秒前
甜美土豆发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
个性的紫菜应助May0791采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
xhy完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
彩色菲鹰发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
ZYN完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
yeye发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Jane完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
薄年西发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
大个应助小玲仔采纳,获得10
14秒前
中流完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
一个小目标完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
hyyyyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
cqwswfl发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
17秒前
明亮无颜发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
阿谭完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
【本贴是提醒信息,请勿应助】请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2480494
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2143063
关于积分的说明 5464952
捐赠科研通 1865819
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 927457
版权声明 562931
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 496183