医学
等长运动
血压
内科学
心脏病学
物理疗法
舒张期
随机对照试验
收缩
体力活动
原发性高血压
手部力量
安慰剂
作者
Chia‐Wei Lin,Ian Jun,Vincent Igbo,Amir Babaniamansour,Lingyue Meng,Cheng‐Feng Lin,Yih‐Kuen Jan
摘要
ABSTRACT The systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed to examine the dose‐response relationship between isometric handgrip (IHG) training and blood pressure outcomes in normotensive and hypertensive populations. Three databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were searched from inception to June 2025. Thirty‐one studies with 905 participants (51% male) met the criteria. Primary outcomes were resting systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale and RoB‐2. Meta‐regression was used to evaluate dose‐response effects on SBP and DBP. The included studies demonstrated fair to good methodological quality (5.9 ± 1.0). Moderate evidence indicated that IHG reduced SBP (–5.38 mmHg, 95% CI –6.91 to –3.85; p < 0.001; I 2 = 86% and DBP (–2.71 mmHg, 95% CI –3.75 to –1.66; p < 0.001; I 2 = 90%), with greater effects observed in hypertensive compared to normotensive groups. For meta‐regression, lower training intensity protocols (<30% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction [MVIC]) yield smaller blood pressure‐lowering effects in both SBP ( p = 0.043) and DBP ( p = 0.032). Higher weekly frequency (e.g., >3 to 7 days/week) was associated with a diminished effect in SBP ( p = 0.032). In conclusion, the IHG training significantly lowers SBP and DBP in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals, offering preventive benefits for normotensive individuals at risk for hypertension and therapeutic potential for hypertensive patients. The evidence‐informed protocol might appear to be four sets of 2‐min unilateral contractions at ≥30 MVIC, performed ≤3 times per week for a minimum of 8 weeks. These findings support IHG as a practical non‐pharmacological strategy for blood pressure management. Registration : PROSPERO number: CRD420251154235
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI