A Three-Way Accuracy Comparison of the Dexcom G5, Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense CGM Devices in an Outpatient Study of Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes

连续血糖监测 医学 人工胰腺 1型糖尿病 统计显著性 门诊部 糖尿病 平均差 数学 统计 内科学 内分泌学 置信区间
作者
Rabab Jafri,Courtney A. Balliro,Firas H. El-Khatib,MICHELE MAHENO,Mallory Hillard,ALEXANDER J. O'DONOVAN,Rajendranath Selagamsetty,Hui Zheng,Edward R. Damiano,Steven Russell
出处
期刊:Diabetes [American Diabetes Association]
卷期号:67 (Supplement_1) 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.2337/db18-14-or
摘要

There are no published studies directly comparing the accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices in the outpatient setting. We tested the performance of the Dexcom G5, Abbot Freestyle Libre Pro, and Senseonics Eversense (an implantable CGM approved in Europe) during a 6-week, free-living, outpatient bionic pancreas study involving 23 subjects with type 1 diabetes who wore all 3 devices concomitantly. The primary outcome was the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) vs. plasma glucose (PG) values measured with the Nova Biomedical StatStrip Xpress meter that was also used for calibrations according to the manufacturer's instruction (except for Libre Pro that is not calibrated). We compared PG values with CGM readings when they were available from all 3 CGMS in the 5 minutes preceding the PG values (n=829 sets). Since the Libre Pro records readings every 15 minutes, we also did a two-way comparison between the G5 and the Eversense that allowed a higher number of comparisons (n=2277 sets). Statistical significance was determined using a repeated measurements model fitted with the generalized estimating equation method. All 3 CGM systems produced higher average MARDs than during in-clinic studies. However, since all three CGM systems were worn by the same individuals and used the same meter for calibration and as comparator, we were able to directly compare their performance under real-world conditions. In the 3-way comparison Eversense achieved the lowest nominal MARD (14.8%) followed by Dexcom G5 (16.3%) and Libre Pro (18.0%) (Eversense vs. Libre Pro p=0.004, other comparisons p=NS). In the 2-way comparison the MARD difference between Eversense (15.1%) and G5 (16.9%) was statistically significant (p=0.008). We found that the point accuracy of the Eversense was significantly better than two other CGM systems. The Eversense CGM system may be useful to provide glucose values to artificial pancreas devices. Disclosure R.Z. Jafri: None. C.A. Balliro: None. F. El-Khatib: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Beta Bionics. Employee; Self; Beta Bionics. M. Maheno: None. M.A. Hillard: None. A.J. O'Donovan: None. R. Selagamsetty: None. H. Zheng: None. E. Damiano: Other Relationship; Self; Beta Bionics. S.J. Russell: Other Relationship; Self; Beta Bionics, Novo Nordisk Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; Companion Medical, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., Unomedical a/s. Research Support; Self; Beta Bionics, Zealand Pharma A/S, MITRE Corporation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
lfc完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
小二郎应助nacoo采纳,获得10
1秒前
4秒前
5秒前
学术文献互助应助初景采纳,获得200
6秒前
7秒前
Jjjjj发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lalala完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
vcc完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
lzy完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
13秒前
bbihk完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
852应助飞起来采纳,获得10
14秒前
木玉成约完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
肉肉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
lzy发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
我是小汪应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
16秒前
FashionBoy应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
万能图书馆应助五毛采纳,获得10
17秒前
韦一手发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
17秒前
Trenblin发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
Ava应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
17秒前
tammy发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
我是小汪应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
orixero应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
华仔应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
18秒前
18秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
科目三应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7265412
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8886370
关于积分的说明 18781324
捐赠科研通 6942994
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3202888
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2376023
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2178803