荟萃分析
心理信息
心理学
随机对照试验
社交焦虑
焦虑
心理治疗师
临床心理学
梅德林
出版偏见
精神科
医学
内科学
政治学
法学
作者
Nino de Ponti,Minoo Matbouriahi,Pamela Franco,Mathias Harrer,Clara Miguel,Davide Papola,Ayşesu Sicimoğlu,Pim J. Cuijpers,Eirini Karyotaki
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102881
摘要
BACKGROUND: Given the growth in research examining the effects of psychotherapy on social anxiety disorder (SAD), an up-to-date comprehensive meta-analysis in this field is needed. METHODS: We selected studies from a database of randomized trials (RCTs) on psychotherapies for anxiety disorders (last updated search of PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane (CENTRAL): 1 January 2024) We included RCTs comparing psychotherapy to a control condition for adults with SAD and conducted random effects meta-analyses to examine the efficacy of psychotherapy compared to control conditions at post-treatment. RESULTS: = 74 %; 95 % CI: 69 to 79, NNT = 3.8). Effects remained robust across sensitivity analyses. However, there was evidence for significant risk of bias in the included trials. The multivariable meta-regression indicated significant differences in treatment delivery formats, type of recruitment strategy, target group, and number of sessions. CONCLUSION: Psychotherapy is an effective treatment for SAD, with moderate to large effect sizes across all treatment types and formats. Future research is needed to determine the long-term effects.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI