An Examination of Acoustic Neuroprotection in the Neonate

医学 心理干预 新生儿重症监护室 随机对照试验 分贝 金标准(测试) 干预(咨询) 梅德林 系统回顾 人口 包裹体(矿物) 重症监护医学 听力学 儿科 护理部 外科 环境卫生 心理学 内科学 法学 社会心理学 政治学
作者
Peyton Lewis Chumley,Katherine M. Dudding,David E. Vance
出处
期刊:Advances in Neonatal Care [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:25 (4): 337-345
标识
DOI:10.1097/anc.0000000000001280
摘要

Background: Hearing loss in neonates is more than 100 times that of the general pediatric population. Research suggests that there is a large amount of toxic noise exposure for these neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit and in the transport environments. Thus, acoustic neuroprotection, or auditory protection and support of neurodevelopment, is an important concept, particularly for neonates. Purpose: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the possibility of successfully supporting acoustic neuroprotection and decreasing the ambient noise level to the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Methods/Search Strategy: Across 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and Science Direct), 21 articles were identified.Following PRISMA guidelines, the search was expanded to articles less than 20 years old due to lack of current studies. Inclusion criteria for articles were: infants less than 1 year old; written in English or translated to English; published within last 20 years unless seminal research; a unit quality improvement project; a literature review; a peer-reviewed article. Exclusion criteria were duplicated articles and qualitative studies. Decibel levels were extracted from articles in various neonate environments and then compared to standard recommendations. Results: Overall, the reviewed studies provided evidence that current interventions are unsuccessful in decreasing the amount of toxic noise exposure. Implications for Research and Practice: There are no “gold standard” interventions for protection of neonatal auditory systems, leading to inconsistent usage of current interventions and an overall lack of intervention focused research. More research is needed, particularly randomized controlled trials.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
lily完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
陈敬天完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Lucas应助丰富的小海豚采纳,获得10
3秒前
tszjw168发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
FashionBoy应助学啊学123采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
Flowing完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Raien发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
我是老大应助glass_light采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
JoJoT发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
小白完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
hui完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
尊敬寒松发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
核桃发布了新的文献求助20
6秒前
ahxb完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
打打应助HP采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
hui发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lily发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
Sodagreen2023完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
小白发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
阿蜡完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Claire9518完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
TGM_Hedwig发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
曾鑫发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
Owen应助tszjw168采纳,获得50
14秒前
狂野冰蝶完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7745957
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9293823
关于积分的说明 20222405
捐赠科研通 7325598
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3307993
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2459976
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2319431