医学
胎盘植入
放射科
回顾性队列研究
不利影响
子宫切除术
产科
怀孕
内科学
胎盘
胎儿
遗传学
生物
作者
Tao Lu,Mingpeng Wu,Yishuang Wang,Mou Li,Hang Li,Feng Zhang,Yi Yuan,Meilin Zhu,Xinyi Zhao
摘要
Background MRI features may be associated with adverse maternal outcome in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders even with abdominal aortic balloon occlusion (AABO). Purpose This study aimed to identify risk factors of MRI for association with adverse maternal outcome in patients with PAS disorders after AABO. Study Type Retrospective. Population Clinical and MRI features of 80 patients were retrospectively reviewed from October 2016 to August 2021. A total of 40 patients had adverse maternal outcomes including intrapartum/peripartum bleeding >1000 mL and/or emergency hysterectomy after AABO. Sequence Half‐Fourier acquisition single‐shot turbo spin echo and gradient echo imaging True fast imaging with steady‐state precession (True‐FISP) at 1.5T MR scanner. Assessment MRI features were evaluated by three radiologists and were tested for any association with adverse maternal outcome. Statistical Tests Interobserver agreement was calculated with kappa ( k ) statistics. Association between MRI features and adverse maternal outcomes were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. A nomogram was constructed based on the logistic regression. Results The interobserver agreement ranged from fair to substantial ( k = 0.379–0.783). Multivariate analyses revealed that short cervical length (OR: 4.344), abnormal intraplacental vascularity (OR: 6.005), placental bulge (OR: 9.085), and myometrial interruption (OR: 9.550) were independent risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes. The combination of four risk factors together demonstrated the highest AUC of 0.851 (95% CI 0.769–0.933) with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.5% and 72.5%, respectively and then a nomogram composed of the above four risk factors was constructed to represent the probability of adverse maternal outcome. Data Conclusion The nomogram demonstrated the association between MRI features and patient's poor outcome after undergoing AABO and C‐section delivery for PAS. Evidence Level 4 Technical Efficacy Stage 3
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI