医学
随机对照试验
临时的
中期分析
样本量测定
心理干预
临床试验
梅德林
干预(咨询)
家庭医学
内科学
精神科
数学
法学
统计
历史
政治学
考古
作者
Víctor M. Montori,P.J. Devereaux,Neill K. J. Adhikari,Karen E. A. Burns,C. Eggert,Matthias Briel,Christina Lacchetti,Teresa W. Leung,Elizabeth Darling,Dianne Bryant,Heiner C. Bucher,Holger J. Schünemann,Maureen O. Meade,Deborah J Cook,Patricia J. Erwin,Amit Sood,Richa Sood,Benjamin Lo,Carly A. Thompson,Qi Zhou
出处
期刊:PubMed
[National Institutes of Health]
日期:2005-11-02
卷期号:294 (17): 2203-9
被引量:694
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.294.17.2203
摘要
RCTs stopped early for benefit are becoming more common, often fail to adequately report relevant information about the decision to stop early, and show implausibly large treatment effects, particularly when the number of events is small. These findings suggest clinicians should view the results of such trials with skepticism.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI