已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Are group-based and individual physiotherapy exercise programmes equally effective for musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis

物理疗法 医学 心理干预 荟萃分析 随机对照试验 物理医学与康复 肌肉骨骼痛 外科 精神科 内科学
作者
Mary O’Keeffe,Amy Hayes,Karen McCreesh,Helen Purtill,Kieran O’Sullivan
出处
期刊:British Journal of Sports Medicine [BMJ]
卷期号:51 (2): 126-132 被引量:66
标识
DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095410
摘要

Background Musculoskeletal pain is common and its treatment costly. Both group and individual physiotherapy interventions which incorporate exercise aim to reduce pain and disability. Do the additional time and costs of individual physiotherapy result in superior outcomes? Objective To compare the effectiveness of group and individual physiotherapy including exercise on musculoskeletal pain and disability. Methods Eleven electronic databases were searched by two independent reviewers. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) including participants with musculoskeletal conditions which compared group and individual physiotherapy interventions that incorporated exercise were eligible. Study quality was assessed using the PEDro scale by two independent reviewers, and treatment effects were compared by meta-analyses. Results Fourteen RCTs were eligible, including patients with low back pain (7 studies), neck pain (4), knee pain (2) and shoulder pain (1). We found no clinically significant differences in pain and disability between group and individual physiotherapy involving exercise. Conclusions Only small, clinically irrelevant differences in pain or disability outcomes were found between group and individual physiotherapy incorporating exercise. Since all but one study included other interventions together with exercise in either the group or individual arm, deciphering the unique effect of the way in which exercise is delivered is difficult. Group interventions may need to be considered more often, given their similar effectiveness and potentially lower healthcare costs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
库里强发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
斯文败类应助如梦采纳,获得10
2秒前
落寞臻完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
LiuRuizhe发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
chiyudoubao完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
如梦完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
丹丹完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
谦让的青亦完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
852应助烟火还是永恒采纳,获得10
14秒前
nx发布了新的文献求助50
15秒前
16秒前
彭于晏应助搞怪的醉波采纳,获得10
17秒前
羊羊驳回了情怀应助
18秒前
19秒前
molicha完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
mingjiang发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
23秒前
nx完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
毅诚菌完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
迷人世开完成签到,获得积分0
27秒前
Adhsksa发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
29秒前
pathway完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
orixero应助Eason小川采纳,获得10
31秒前
ab完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
35秒前
DE2022发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
SYLH应助阿牛奶采纳,获得10
37秒前
万能图书馆应助graham1101采纳,获得10
38秒前
yy2023发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
飞龙在天完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
46秒前
46秒前
49秒前
Charlie完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
graham1101发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
51秒前
51秒前
悦耳代亦完成签到 ,获得积分0
52秒前
无我发布了新的文献求助10
52秒前
高分求助中
Thinking Small and Large 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Advances in Underwater Acoustics, Structural Acoustics, and Computational Methodologies 400
Genome Editing and Engineering: From TALENs, ZFNs and CRISPRs to Molecular Surgery 300
Getting Published in SSCI Journals: 200+ Questions and Answers for Absolute Beginners 300
The Monocyte-to-HDL ratio (MHR) as a prognostic and diagnostic biomarker in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis (P9-14.010) 240
Null Objects from a Cross-Linguistic and Developmental Perspective 200
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3833637
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3376134
关于积分的说明 10491700
捐赠科研通 3095630
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1704502
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 820037
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 771775