概念框架
忠诚
系统回顾
服务(商务)
领域(数学)
心理学
干预(咨询)
管理科学
循证医学
质量(理念)
随机对照试验
计算机科学
应用心理学
梅德林
医学
替代医学
精神科
工程类
病理
社会学
政治学
数学
纯数学
法学
社会科学
经济
哲学
经济
认识论
电信
作者
Stanley V. Catts,Brian I. O’Toole,Vaughan J. Carr,Terry J. Lewin,Amanda L. Neil,Meredith Harris,Aaron Frost,Belinda Crissman,Kathy Eadie,Russell W. Evans
标识
DOI:10.3109/00048670903487167
摘要
The literature that is relevant to evaluation of treatment effectiveness is large, scattered and difficult to assemble for appraisal. This scoping review first develops a conceptual framework to help organize the field, and second, uses the framework to appraise early psychosis intervention (EPI) studies. Literature searches were used to identify representative study designs, which were then sorted according to evaluation approach. The groupings provided a conceptual framework upon which a map of the field could be drawn. Key words were cross-checked against definitions in dictionaries of scientific terms and the National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) browser. Using the final list of key words as search terms, the EPI evaluation literature was appraised. Experimental studies could be grouped into two classes: efficacy and effectiveness randomized controlled trials. Non-experimental studies could be subgrouped into at least four overlapping categories: clinical epidemiological; health service evaluations; quality assurance studies; and, quasi-experimental assessments of treatment effects. Applying this framework to appraise EPI studies indicated promising evidence for the effectiveness of EPI irrespective of study design type, and a clearer picture of where future evaluation efforts should be focused. Reliance on clinical trials alone will restrict the type of information that can inform clinical practice. There is convergent evidence for the benefits of specialized EPI service functions across a range of study designs. Greater investment in health services research and quality assurance approaches in evaluating EPI effectiveness should be made, which will involve scaling up of study sizes and development of an EPI programme fidelity rating template. The degree of complexity of the evaluation field suggests that greater focus on research methodology in the training of Australasian psychiatrists is urgently needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI