Appraising Evidence for Intervention Effectiveness in Early Psychosis: Conceptual Framework and Review of Evaluation Approaches

概念框架 忠诚 系统回顾 服务(商务) 领域(数学) 心理学 干预(咨询) 管理科学 循证医学 质量(理念) 随机对照试验 计算机科学 应用心理学 梅德林 医学 替代医学 精神科 工程类 病理 社会学 政治学 数学 纯数学 法学 社会科学 经济 哲学 经济 认识论 电信
作者
Stanley V. Catts,Brian I. O’Toole,Vaughan J. Carr,Terry J. Lewin,Amanda L. Neil,Meredith Harris,Aaron Frost,Belinda Crissman,Kathy Eadie,Russell W. Evans
出处
期刊:Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:44 (3): 195-219 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.3109/00048670903487167
摘要

The literature that is relevant to evaluation of treatment effectiveness is large, scattered and difficult to assemble for appraisal. This scoping review first develops a conceptual framework to help organize the field, and second, uses the framework to appraise early psychosis intervention (EPI) studies. Literature searches were used to identify representative study designs, which were then sorted according to evaluation approach. The groupings provided a conceptual framework upon which a map of the field could be drawn. Key words were cross-checked against definitions in dictionaries of scientific terms and the National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) browser. Using the final list of key words as search terms, the EPI evaluation literature was appraised. Experimental studies could be grouped into two classes: efficacy and effectiveness randomized controlled trials. Non-experimental studies could be subgrouped into at least four overlapping categories: clinical epidemiological; health service evaluations; quality assurance studies; and, quasi-experimental assessments of treatment effects. Applying this framework to appraise EPI studies indicated promising evidence for the effectiveness of EPI irrespective of study design type, and a clearer picture of where future evaluation efforts should be focused. Reliance on clinical trials alone will restrict the type of information that can inform clinical practice. There is convergent evidence for the benefits of specialized EPI service functions across a range of study designs. Greater investment in health services research and quality assurance approaches in evaluating EPI effectiveness should be made, which will involve scaling up of study sizes and development of an EPI programme fidelity rating template. The degree of complexity of the evaluation field suggests that greater focus on research methodology in the training of Australasian psychiatrists is urgently needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
身处人海发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
执着道之完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
mango发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
小二郎应助复杂听筠采纳,获得50
2秒前
今后应助微子采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
打打应助ljymedical采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
龙傲天发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
尊敬的靖柔完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
共享精神应助一只孙小忆采纳,获得10
6秒前
ayan发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
小马甲应助bingo采纳,获得10
6秒前
可爱的小福宝完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
伶俐浩轩发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
lllzee完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
香菜丸子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
星辰大海应助愉快的铅笔采纳,获得10
11秒前
小米粥发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
3658无情的迎彤完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
晴天完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
研友_Zzadpn给研友_Zzadpn的求助进行了留言
13秒前
公爵发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
ljymedical发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
张小野发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
复杂听筠完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
隐形曼青应助lkk采纳,获得10
16秒前
v0id应助cm5257采纳,获得10
17秒前
赘婿应助ayan采纳,获得10
17秒前
包包琪发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 1500
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7508397
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9097225
关于积分的说明 19413573
捐赠科研通 7115577
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3252211
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2421338
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2238559