MCM10 as a novel prognostic biomarker and its relevance to immune infiltration in gliomas

BACKGROUND: Gliomas are one of the most common malignancies in the central nervous system (CNS). Members of the minichromosomal maintenance protein (MCM) family play an essential role in diagnosing and prognosis of malignant tumors. MCM10 is found in gliomas, but the prognosis and immune infiltration of gliomas has not been elucidated. OBJECTIVE: To explore the biological function and immune infiltration of MCM10 in gliomas and provide a reference for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic evaluation. METHODS: The MCM10 expression profile and the clinical information database of glioma patients were obtained from the China Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) and Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) glioma data. We analyzed the MCM10 expression levels in various cancers from The TCGA.RNA sequencing data were analyzed using the R packages to determine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between high- and low MCM10 expressing GBM tissues from the TCGA-GBM database. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare MCM10 expression levels in glioma and normal brain tissue. To evaluate the value of MCM10 expressions in the prognosis of glioma patients by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, a univariate Cox analysis, multivariate Cox analysis, and a ROC curve analysis were used to analyze the correlation of MCM10 expression and the clinicopathological features of glioma patients using the TCGA database data. Subsequently, a functional enrichment analysis was performed to explore its potential signaling pathways and biological functions. Moreover, a single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was used to assess the extent of immune cell infiltration. Lastly, the authors constructed a nomogram to predict the overall survival rate (OS) of gliomas at 1, 3 and 5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: MCM10 is highly expressed in 20 cancer types including gliomas, and MCM10 expression was an independent adverse prognostic factor in glioma patients. Similarly, high expression of MCM10 was associated with advanced age (60 years), increased tumor grade, tumor recurrence or development of a secondary tumor, IDH wild-type, and non-codeletion of 1p19q (p< 0.01). The OS nomogram generated a consistency index of 0.821. The results of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment and Gene Ontology (GO) functional analysis showed that the cell-cycle-related and tumor-related signaling pathways were significantly enriched in the MCM10 high expression phenotype. Moreover, signaling pathways were significantly enriched in Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), including Rho GTPases, M phase, DNA repair, extracellular matrix organization, and nuclear receptors. Furthermore, MCM10 over expression was negatively correlated with the level of immune cell infiltration in natural killer CD56 bright cells, follicular helper T cells, plasmacytoma dendritic cells, and dendritic cells. CONCLUSION: MCM10 is an independent prognostic index of glioma patients, and the high expression of MCM10 suggests a poor prognosis; MCM10 expression is closely related to the immune cell infiltration of gliomas, and MCM10 may be related to drug resistance and development of gliomas.