医学
前列腺癌
前列腺切除术
麦克内马尔试验
前列腺
放射科
活检
泌尿科
癌症
核医学
内科学
统计
数学
作者
Públio César Cavalcante Viana,Marcelo A. Queiroz,Fábio Oliveira Ferreira,Adriano Basso Dias,Natally Horvat,Maurício Cordeiro,Cláudio Bovolenta Murta,Giuliano Guglielmetti,Rafael F. Coelho,Leonardo Cardili,José Aírton de Freitas Pontes,William Carlos Nahas,Giovanni Guido Cerri
摘要
Abstract Objective To evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), mpMRI combined with PSA density (PSAd) and combined biopsy (CBx) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing active surveillance, using radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens as the reference standard. Patients and Methods In this prospective single‐centre study, 91 patients with low‐risk prostate cancer under active surveillance underwent mpMRI, PSAd measurement, CBx and ultimately RP. mpMRI was reported using PI‐RADS v2.0, and PSAd was dichotomised at 0.12 ng/ml/cm 3 . Diagnostic accuracy was compared using ISUP grade ≥2 and ≥3 thresholds. Radical prostatectomy pathology served as the reference standard. Results For detecting ISUP ≥3 cancer, mpMRI combined with PSAd achieved the highest sensitivity (93.3%) and negative predictive value (94.4%). CBx demonstrated the highest specificity (88.2%) and overall diagnostic balance (Youden index = 0.348). mpMRI alone showed intermediate performance. Differences in classification between strategies were statistically significant (McNemar p < 0.001). Conclusions mpMRI combined with PSAd provides high sensitivity and negative predictive value for ruling out aggressive prostate cancer, supporting its use as a non‐invasive triage tool in active surveillance. CBx remains the most specific method for histological confirmation. These strategies should be used complementarily to optimise decision‐making in active surveillance protocols.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI