细胞因子释放综合征
医学
多发性骨髓瘤
嵌合抗原受体
人口
免疫系统
T细胞
抗原
免疫学
免疫疗法
汽车T细胞治疗
肿瘤科
内科学
沙利度胺
耐火材料(行星科学)
细胞因子
醛类白血病
癌症研究
临床试验
细胞毒性T细胞
联合疗法
B细胞
等离子体电池
细胞疗法
地塞米松
受体
作者
Sham Mailankody,Sneha Mitra,Kevin Herrera,Bachisio Ziccheddu,Briana Cadzin,Özgür Can Eren,Tasmin Farzana,Tahmin Ullah,Jonathan Landa,Andriy Derkach,Jagrutiben Chaudhari,Devin McAvoy,Kinga Hosszu,Gunjan L. Shah,Heather Landau,Francesco Maura,Ahmet Doǧan,Sergio Giralt,X Wang,Michel Sadelain
出处
期刊:Blood
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2026-07-07
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.2025032122
摘要
BCMA and GPRC5D-directed therapies have shown high efficacy in the treatment of relapsed or refractory myeloma with multiple new immune therapies now approved. Preclinical studies have shown that expression of BCMA and GPRC5D are heterogenous in malignant plasma cells. We conducted a phase I dose escalation trial of the BCMA CAR T cell therapy MCARH125 alone or in combination with the GPRC5D CAR T cell therapy MCARH109 in patients with heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were treated across three dose levels and the primary objective of establishing safety of the concurrent infusion. The trial is registered in ClinTrials.gov, NCT05431608 and has now completed accrual. We treated 15 patients across 3 dose levels; this included 6 patients who received MCARH125 alone and 9 patients treated with concurrent infusion of MCARH125 and MCARH109. 1 patient each with MCARH 125 alone and the co-infusion of MCARH125 and MCARH109 developed immune effector cell associated hemophagocytic syndrome (IEC-HS). There were no instances of grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS). The overall response for co-infusion was 78% with a median PFS of 18.2 months. Correlative analysis suggests that antigen loss maybe an important mechanism of resistance even with dual-antigen targeting and we show for the first time that expansion of one CAR population can limit expansion of the second population, as dual-CAR treated patients had significantly less BCMA-CAR expansion than BCMA-CAR alone treated patients, despite equivalent BCMA CAR T cell doses at infusion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI