谐振器
绝缘体上的硅
材料科学
太比特
硅光子学
光子学
光子晶体
光电子学
群时延和相位时延
色散(光学)
光学
硅
计算机科学
物理
波分复用
电信
带宽(计算)
波长
作者
Andrea Ivano Melloni,Antonio Canciamilla,C. Ferrari,Francesco Morichetti,Liam O’Faoláin,Thomas F. Krauss,R.M. De La Rue,Antonio Samarelli,Marc Sorel
出处
期刊:IEEE Photonics Journal
[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]
日期:2010-03-24
卷期号:2 (2): 181-194
被引量:197
标识
DOI:10.1109/jphot.2010.2044989
摘要
In this paper, we report a direct comparison between coupled resonator optical waveguides (CROWs) and photonic crystal waveguides (PhCWs), which have both been exploited as tunable delay lines. The two structures were fabricated on the same silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technological platform, with the same fabrication facilities and evaluated under the same signal bit-rate conditions. We compare the frequency- and time-domain response of the two structures; the physical mechanism underlying the tuning of the delay; the main limits induced by loss, dispersion, and structural disorder; and the impact of CROW and PhCW tunable delay lines on the transmission of data stream intensity and phase modulated up to 100 Gb/s. The main result of this study is that, in the considered domain of applications, CROWs and PhCWs behave much more similarly than one would expect. At data rates around 100 Gb/s, CROWs and PhCWs can be placed in competition. Lower data rates, where longer absolute delays are required and propagation loss becomes a critical issue, are the preferred domain of CROWs fabricated with large ring resonators, while at data rates in the terabit range, PhCWs remain the leading technology.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI