Clinico-Pathological Study Multiregional sampling reveals a homogenous distribution of Ki-67 proliferation rate in pituitary adenomas

Ki-67 antigen is used as a marker of proliferative activity that is linked to growth rate, invasiveness and prognosis of pituitary adenomas. So far the distribution of Ki-67 index within an individual adenoma has not been investigated. If Ki-67 antigen expression differs significantly within an individual pituitary adenoma, a sampling error may result when assessing small fragments of adenoma tissue. Such a potential error would diminish the value of Ki-67 as a tool for postoperative patient management considerations. The aim of the present study was to assess Ki-67 proliferation rates in different regions of pituitary adenomas and to statistically analyse these data for potential regional differences within each tumor. Ki-67 proliferation index was assessed in smear preparations of 100 specimens of 26 consecutive patients operated on for pituitary adenoma in the Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University Vienna. Depending on the size and extent of the tumor, a mean of 4 tissue samples (range 2–8) was selected intraoperatively from each adenoma from endosellar, suprasellar, parasellar, and basal sellar dural locations. Overall mean cell proliferation rate measured by Ki-67 was 1.81 0.90% (range 0.33–3.43%). Histologically invasive adenomas had significantly higher mean Ki-67 proliferation index in all samples from the same tumor than non-invasive adenomas (2.01 0.91% vs. 1.11 0.59%; P1⁄4 0.024). Multiregional sampling revealed a homogenous distribution of Ki-67 index throughout an individual adenoma with no significant differences between any two different regions on t-test. Our data confirm that location of a biopsy does not influence Ki-67 index. Therefore, Ki-67 index of a single biopsy is representative for the whole individual adenoma. Thus Ki-67 index can be considered a reliable parameter for assessment of cell proliferation rate in adenoma biopsies and may be used for postoperative patient management considerations.