医学
2型糖尿病
危险系数
内科学
逻辑回归
优势比
队列
比例危险模型
曲线下面积
糖尿病
人口
队列研究
置信区间
低风险
人口学
内分泌学
环境卫生
社会学
作者
Chenglong Yu,Zhen Zhou,Franz‐Josef Neumann,Tian Lin,Catherine Robb,Peter Fransquet,John J. McNeil,Naomi R. Wray,Sophia Zoungas,Paul Lacaze
摘要
Abstract Aims The utility of a polygenic score (PGS) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been demonstrated in the general adult population. However, while previous studies have included older adults within broader age ranges, the performance of PGS specifically in older individuals aged ≥70 years remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the predictive utility of a PGS in an older cohort. Materials and Methods We derived a PGS in 12 174 Australian participants aged ≥70 years from the ASPREE trial, with a median follow‐up of 4.6 years. T2D was defined by self‐report, commencement of glucose‐lowering medication, or a fasting plasma glucose of ≥7.0 mmol/L. Multivariable logistic and Cox models examined associations between the PGS and baseline and incident T2D, adjusting for clinical risk factors. Risk prediction was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), C‐index, and net reclassification improvement (NRI). Results At baseline, 1150 (9.4%) participants had prevalent T2D. During follow‐up, an additional 590 (4.8%) developed incident T2D. Per standard deviation, the PGS was significantly associated with baseline (odds ratio: 2.39 [95% CI: 2.19–2.61]) and incident (hazard ratio: 1.55 [1.40–1.71]) T2D. The PGS improved prediction over the clinical risk factors, increasing the AUC from 0.70 to 0.79, and C‐index from 0.67 to 0.71 (both p < 0.001). Adding the PGS to a clinical risk model resulted in NRI of 0.63 [0.57–0.71] for baseline T2D and 0.42 [0.30–0.51] for incident T2D within 5 years. Conclusion The PGS significantly enhances T2D risk prediction in older adults, supporting its potential as a clinical tool for risk stratification.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI