Effect of Remifentanil vs Neuromuscular Blockers During Rapid Sequence Intubation on Successful Intubation Without Major Complications Among Patients at Risk of Aspiration

医学 瑞芬太尼 麻醉 罗库溴铵 插管 随机对照试验 气管插管 人口 外科 异丙酚 环境卫生
作者
Nicolas Grillot,Gilles Lebuffe,Olivier Huet,Sigismond Lasocki,Xavier Pichon,Mathieu Oudot,Nathalie Bruneau,Jean David,Pierre Bouzat,Alexandra Jobert,Martine Tching-Sin,Fanny Feuillet,Raphaël Cinotti,Karim Asehnoune,Antoine Roquilly,Pascal Incagnoli,Anne Li,Xavier Pichon,Amazigh AGUERSIF,Vincent Minville
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:329 (1): 28-28 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.23550
摘要

Importance: It is uncertain whether a rapid-onset opioid is noninferior to a rapid-onset neuromuscular blocker during rapid sequence intubation when used in conjunction with a hypnotic agent. Objective: To determine whether remifentanil is noninferior to rapid-onset neuromuscular blockers for rapid sequence intubation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial among 1150 adults at risk of aspiration (fasting for <6 hours, bowel occlusion, recent trauma, or severe gastroesophageal reflux) who underwent tracheal intubation in the operating room at 15 hospitals in France from October 2019 to April 2021. Follow-up was completed on May 15, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive neuromuscular blockers (1 mg/kg of succinylcholine or rocuronium; n = 575) or remifentanil (3 to 4 μg/kg; n = 575) immediately after injection of a hypnotic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was assessed in all randomized patients (as-randomized population) and in all eligible patients who received assigned treatment (per-protocol population). The primary outcome was successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications, defined as lung aspiration of digestive content, oxygen desaturation, major hemodynamic instability, sustained arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, and severe anaphylactic reaction. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 7.0%. Results: Among 1150 randomized patients (mean age, 50.7 [SD, 17.4] years; 573 [50%] women), 1130 (98.3%) completed the trial. In the as-randomized population, tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications occurred in 374 of 575 patients (66.1%) in the remifentanil group and 408 of 575 (71.6%) in the neuromuscular blocker group (between-group difference adjusted for randomization strata and center, -6.1%; 95% CI, -11.6% to -0.5%; P = .37 for noninferiority), demonstrating inferiority. In the per-protocol population, 374 of 565 patients (66.2%) in the remifentanil group and 403 of 565 (71.3%) in the neuromuscular blocker group had successful intubation without major complications (adjusted difference, -5.7%; 2-sided 95% CI, -11.3% to -0.1%; P = .32 for noninferiority). An adverse event of hemodynamic instability was recorded in 19 of 575 patients (3.3%) with remifentanil and 3 of 575 (0.5%) with neuromuscular blockers (adjusted difference, 2.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-4.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults at risk of aspiration during rapid sequence intubation in the operating room, remifentanil, compared with neuromuscular blockers, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority with regard to successful intubation on first attempt without major complications. Although remifentanil was statistically inferior to neuromuscular blockers, the wide confidence interval around the effect estimate remains compatible with noninferiority and limits conclusions about the clinical relevance of the difference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03960801.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
BUG发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
haha应助蛋花花花采纳,获得10
1秒前
momochichu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
OtterMester完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
愉快的真发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
Akim应助livesey采纳,获得10
3秒前
英姑应助零知识采纳,获得10
3秒前
fengqianxv完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
677完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
定位完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
XianxiangDong发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助是小橙呀采纳,获得10
6秒前
欢喜猕猴桃完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Xingkun_li发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
顾矜应助自然浩阑采纳,获得30
7秒前
武子阳发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
BUG发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
周杰伦啦啦完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助闫雪采纳,获得10
8秒前
巫马尔槐发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
小葡萄完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Xia完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
xinyuwang完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
JamesPei应助Anonymous采纳,获得10
13秒前
刘杰青完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
XianxiangDong完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
BUG发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
MuMu完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
愉快的真发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
零知识发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
3和6完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
枕冰关注了科研通微信公众号
19秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7256919
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8878826
关于积分的说明 18753527
捐赠科研通 6937017
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3200924
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375047
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176570