Effect of Remifentanil vs Neuromuscular Blockers During Rapid Sequence Intubation on Successful Intubation Without Major Complications Among Patients at Risk of Aspiration

医学 瑞芬太尼 麻醉 罗库溴铵 插管 随机对照试验 气管插管 人口 外科 异丙酚 环境卫生
作者
Nicolas Grillot,Gilles Lebuffe,Olivier Huet,Sigismond Lasocki,Xavier Pichon,Mathieu Oudot,Nathalie Bruneau,Jean David,Pierre Bouzat,Alexandra Jobert,Martine Tching-Sin,Fanny Feuillet,Raphaël Cinotti,Karim Asehnoune,Antoine Roquilly,Pascal Incagnoli,Anne Li,Xavier Pichon,Amazigh AGUERSIF,Vincent Minville
出处
期刊:JAMA [American Medical Association]
卷期号:329 (1): 28-28 被引量:48
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.23550
摘要

Importance: It is uncertain whether a rapid-onset opioid is noninferior to a rapid-onset neuromuscular blocker during rapid sequence intubation when used in conjunction with a hypnotic agent. Objective: To determine whether remifentanil is noninferior to rapid-onset neuromuscular blockers for rapid sequence intubation. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial among 1150 adults at risk of aspiration (fasting for <6 hours, bowel occlusion, recent trauma, or severe gastroesophageal reflux) who underwent tracheal intubation in the operating room at 15 hospitals in France from October 2019 to April 2021. Follow-up was completed on May 15, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive neuromuscular blockers (1 mg/kg of succinylcholine or rocuronium; n = 575) or remifentanil (3 to 4 μg/kg; n = 575) immediately after injection of a hypnotic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was assessed in all randomized patients (as-randomized population) and in all eligible patients who received assigned treatment (per-protocol population). The primary outcome was successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications, defined as lung aspiration of digestive content, oxygen desaturation, major hemodynamic instability, sustained arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, and severe anaphylactic reaction. The prespecified noninferiority margin was 7.0%. Results: Among 1150 randomized patients (mean age, 50.7 [SD, 17.4] years; 573 [50%] women), 1130 (98.3%) completed the trial. In the as-randomized population, tracheal intubation on the first attempt without major complications occurred in 374 of 575 patients (66.1%) in the remifentanil group and 408 of 575 (71.6%) in the neuromuscular blocker group (between-group difference adjusted for randomization strata and center, -6.1%; 95% CI, -11.6% to -0.5%; P = .37 for noninferiority), demonstrating inferiority. In the per-protocol population, 374 of 565 patients (66.2%) in the remifentanil group and 403 of 565 (71.3%) in the neuromuscular blocker group had successful intubation without major complications (adjusted difference, -5.7%; 2-sided 95% CI, -11.3% to -0.1%; P = .32 for noninferiority). An adverse event of hemodynamic instability was recorded in 19 of 575 patients (3.3%) with remifentanil and 3 of 575 (0.5%) with neuromuscular blockers (adjusted difference, 2.8%; 95% CI, 1.2%-4.4%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults at risk of aspiration during rapid sequence intubation in the operating room, remifentanil, compared with neuromuscular blockers, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority with regard to successful intubation on first attempt without major complications. Although remifentanil was statistically inferior to neuromuscular blockers, the wide confidence interval around the effect estimate remains compatible with noninferiority and limits conclusions about the clinical relevance of the difference. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03960801.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
现代访梦完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Kkkkkk完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
齐小明完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
cosimo完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
chencai发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
天真的宝马完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Samsara完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
欢喜的代容完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
hc完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
nice完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Edddddy完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
A梦完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
认真的雪完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
hc发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
Shina完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
气球完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Yun完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
wanci应助天天睡不醒采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
zhang完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
达助发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
PATRICIAUA完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Rui完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
上官若男应助晓世采纳,获得10
8秒前
忆落完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
二月关马完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
echo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
害羞的夏柳完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
小鱼干完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
彭于晏应助我是真人采纳,获得10
9秒前
AAA发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
111完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
Clinical Epidemiology: The Essentials, 6e 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6556249
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8340289
关于积分的说明 17868629
捐赠科研通 5674562
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2940515
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1916404
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1786997