亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Comparative efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

苯拉唑马布 杜皮鲁玛 医学 美波利祖马布 恶化 哮喘 内科学 不利影响 随机对照试验 嗜酸性粒细胞
作者
Ayobami Akenroye,Grace Lassiter,John W. Jackson,Corinne Keet,Jodi B Segal,G. Caleb Alexander,Hwanhee Hong
出处
期刊:The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:150 (5): 1097-1105.e12 被引量:65
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jaci.2022.05.024
摘要

The comparative safety and efficacy of the biologics currently approved for asthma are unclear.We compared the safety and efficacy of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in individuals with severe eosinophilic asthma.We performed a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published 2000 to 2021. We studied Bayesian network meta-analyses of exacerbation rates, prebronchodilator FEV1, the Asthma Control Questionnaire, and serious adverse events in individuals with eosinophilic asthma.Eight randomized clinical trials (n = 6461) were identified. We found in individuals with eosinophils ≥300 cells/μL the following: in reducing exacerbation rates compared to placebo: dupilumab (risk ratio [RR], 0.32; 95% credible interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.45), mepolizumab (RR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.45), and benralizumab (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.55); in improving FEV1: dupilumab (mean difference in milliliters [MD] 230; 95% CI, 160 to 300), benralizumab (MD, 150; 95% CI, 100 to 200), and mepolizumab (MD, 150; 95% CI, 66 to 220); and in reducing Asthma Control Questionnaire scores: mepolizumab (MD, -0.63; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.45), dupilumab (MD, -0.48; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.14), and benralizumab (MD, -0.32; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.21). In individuals with eosinophils 150-299 cells/μL, benralizumab (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73) and dupilumab (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.95) were associated with lower exacerbation rates; and only benralizumab (MD, 81; 95% CI, 8 to 150) significantly improved FEV1. These differences were minimal compared to clinically important thresholds. For serious adverse events in the overall population, mepolizumab (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.92) and benralizumab (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.93) were associated with lower odds of a serious adverse event, while dupilumab was not different from placebo (odds ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.4).There are minimal differences in the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
loii应助123采纳,获得10
2秒前
molihuakai应助初景采纳,获得10
2秒前
寒凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
土豆你个西红柿完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
Cheng完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
24秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
领导范儿应助干净的鸿煊采纳,获得10
25秒前
番茄鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
wanci应助老实的大地采纳,获得10
33秒前
凶狠的寄风完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
40秒前
vv完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
45秒前
CipherSage应助Faiholo采纳,获得10
46秒前
浮游呦呦完成签到,获得积分0
47秒前
zLin发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
48秒前
ziw_sysu完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
初景发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
简单完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
中中完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
组大组强发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
阔达的冷珍完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
tidongzhiwu完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
chenhui完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
沙莎完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小蘑菇应助紧张的大有采纳,获得10
1分钟前
tidongzhiwu发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
凌发发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
凌发完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
久松真一著作集〈第5巻〉禅と芸術 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6534527
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8327828
关于积分的说明 17839518
捐赠科研通 5636137
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2934380
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1910712
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1769161