Yeast prions are heritable protein‐based elements, most of which are amyloid aggregates of functional proteins. Their propagation in cell populations is dependent upon the fragmentation of these aggregates by a core set of chaperone proteins including the J‐protein/Hsp40 Sis1, Hsp70s, and Hsp104. Prions form distinct amyloid structural polymorphisms, called ‘strains' in mammalian systems and ‘variants' in yeast. Recently we and others have uncovered significant complexity in the chaperone requirements of various yeast prions and prion variants, demonstrating that, in contrast to Hsp104 and Hsp70, which have general roles, J‐proteins represent a prion‐specific component of the prion‐propagation machinery. Most notable has been a direct demonstration that the persistence of alternative conformations of prions is dependent on the action of different molecular chaperones. Because J‐proteins often act as targeting factors for Hsp70s, they may constitute the first chaperone response to the presence of amyloid, but a critical barrier to advancing the understanding of chaperone function in prion biology is that the fundamental chaperone requirements for most yeast prions remain unidentified, precluding a comprehensive understanding of how protein sequences give rise to amyloids with distinct patterns of chaperone interaction. Here we will present our latest undergraduate‐generated data regarding: 1) the unusual role of the J‐protein Swa2 in the propagation of the [ URE3 ] prion and our proposal of a novel chaperone complex involving Hsp90, and 2) the conservation of the prion‐maintaining J‐protein functions of both Sis1 and Swa2 in plants. These findings suggest that amyloid structures of alternative prion conformations have unique features that are differentiable by chaperone proteins, revealing a previously unappreciated level of additional complexity that may be exploitable for therapeutic intervention. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R15GM110606. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .