Diaphragmatic Kinetics Assessment by Tissue Doppler Imaging and Extubation Outcome

医学 膈式呼吸 结果(博弈论) 核医学 多普勒效应 放射科 天文 数理经济学 数学 物理 替代医学 病理
作者
Gianmaria Cammarota,Ester Boniolo,Erminio Santangelo,Nello De Vita,Federico Verdina,Samuele Crudo,Ilaria Sguazzotti,Raffaella Perucca,Antonio Messina,Marta Zanoni,Danila Azzolina,Paolo Navalesi,Federico Longhini,Luigi Vetrugno,Elena Bignami,Françesco Della Corte,Riccardo Tarquini,Edoardo De Robertis,Rosanna Vaschetto
出处
期刊:Respiratory Care [American Association for Respiratory Care]
卷期号:66 (6): 983-993 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.4187/respcare.08702
摘要

BACKGROUND: The assessment of diaphragmatic kinetics through tissue Doppler imaging (dTDI) was recently proposed as a means to describe diaphragmatic activity in both healthy individuals and intubated patients undergoing weaning from mechanical ventilation. Our primary aim was to investigate whether the diaphragmatic excursion velocity measured with dTDI at the end of a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) was different in subjects successfully extubated versus those who passed the trial but exhibited extubation failure within 48 h after extubation. METHODS: We enrolled 100 adult subjects, all of whom had successfully passed a 30-min SBT conducted in CPAP of 5 cm H 2 O. In cases of extubation failure within 48 h after liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation, subjects were re-intubated or supported through noninvasive ventilation. dTDI was performed at the end of the SBT to assess excursion, velocity, and acceleration. RESULTS: Extubation was successful in 79 subjects, whereas it failed in 21 subjects. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) inspiratory peak excursion velocity (3.1 [IQR 2.0–4.3] vs 1.8 [1.3–2.6] cm/s, P < .001), mean velocity (1.6 [IQR 1.2–2.4] vs 1.1 [IQR 0.8–1.4] cm/s, P < .001), and acceleration (8.8 [IQR 5.0–17.8] vs 4.2 [IQR 2.4–8.0] cm/s 2 , P = .002) were all significantly higher in subjects who failed extubation compared with those who were successfully extubated. Similarly, the median expiratory peak relaxation velocity (2.6 [IQR 1.9–4.5] vs 1.8 [IQR 1.2–2.5] cm/s, P < .001), mean velocity (1.1 [IQR 0.7–1.7] vs 0.9 [IQR 0.6–1.0] cm/s, P = .002), and acceleration (11.2 [IQR 9.1–19.0] vs 7.1 [IQR 4.6–12.0] cm/s 2 , P = .004) were also higher in the subjects who failed extubation. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, at the end of SBT, subjects who developed extubation failure within 48 h after extubation experienced a greater diaphragmatic activation compared with subjects who were successfully extubated. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03962322.)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
leinhart完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
六月的雨完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
英俊的铭应助今天不加班采纳,获得10
2秒前
结实初翠完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
珍珠发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
CipherSage应助淡定映之采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
所所应助qqq采纳,获得10
4秒前
Akim应助哄哄采纳,获得10
4秒前
哇哇哇完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Jane完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
汉堡包应助生气来找我采纳,获得10
6秒前
乐乐应助标致的听南采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
小小鱼完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
Lou1s完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
ding应助童心未泯采纳,获得10
9秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
corona完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
脑洞疼应助利莫里亚采纳,获得10
10秒前
Lei完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Orange应助cyf采纳,获得10
11秒前
samgood发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助zz采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
13秒前
赘婿应助无一采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
CLSI VET01S-2024 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated From Animals (7th Ed) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7758594
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9304563
关于积分的说明 20281378
捐赠科研通 7342337
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3312241
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2462812
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2326142