Deep Learning Computer-aided Polyp Detection Reduces Adenoma Miss Rate: A United States Multi-center Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study (CADeT-CS Trial)

结肠镜检查 医学 学员 随机对照试验 腺瘤 内科学 结直肠癌 中心(范畴论) 人工智能 医学物理学 普通外科 癌症 考古 结晶学 化学 历史 计算机科学
作者
Jeremy R. Glissen Brown,Nabil Mansour,Pu Wang,Maria Aguilera Chuchuca,Scott B. Minchenberg,Madhuri Chandnani,Lin Liu,Seth A. Gross,Neil Sengupta,Tyler M. Berzin
出处
期刊:Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:20 (7): 1499-1507.e4 被引量:151
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.009
摘要

Background & AimsArtificial intelligence-based computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) systems are intended to address the issue of missed polyps during colonoscopy. The effect of CADe during screening and surveillance colonoscopy has not previously been studied in a United States (U.S.) population.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, multi-center, single-blind randomized tandem colonoscopy study to evaluate a deep-learning based CADe system (EndoScreener, Shanghai Wision AI, China). Patients were enrolled across 4 U.S. academic medical centers from 2019 through 2020. Patients presenting for colorectal cancer screening or surveillance were randomized to CADe colonoscopy first or high-definition white light (HDWL) colonoscopy first, followed immediately by the other procedure in tandem fashion by the same endoscopist. The primary outcome was adenoma miss rate (AMR), and secondary outcomes included sessile serrated lesion (SSL) miss rate and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC).ResultsA total of 232 patients entered the study, with 116 patients randomized to undergo CADe colonoscopy first and 116 patients randomized to undergo HDWL colonoscopy first. After the exclusion of 9 patients, the study cohort included 223 patients. AMR was lower in the CADe-first group compared with the HDWL-first group (20.12% [34/169] vs 31.25% [45/144]; odds ratio [OR], 1.8048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0780-3.0217; P = .0247). SSL miss rate was lower in the CADe-first group (7.14% [1/14]) vs the HDWL-first group (42.11% [8/19]; P = .0482). First-pass APC was higher in the CADe-first group (1.19 [standard deviation (SD), 2.03] vs 0.90 [SD, 1.55]; P = .0323). First-pass ADR was 50.44% in the CADe-first group and 43.64 % in the HDWL-first group (P = .3091).ConclusionIn this U.S. multicenter tandem colonoscopy randomized controlled trial, we demonstrate a decrease in AMR and SSL miss rate and an increase in first-pass APC with the use of a CADe-system when compared with HDWL colonoscopy alone. Artificial intelligence-based computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) systems are intended to address the issue of missed polyps during colonoscopy. The effect of CADe during screening and surveillance colonoscopy has not previously been studied in a United States (U.S.) population. We conducted a prospective, multi-center, single-blind randomized tandem colonoscopy study to evaluate a deep-learning based CADe system (EndoScreener, Shanghai Wision AI, China). Patients were enrolled across 4 U.S. academic medical centers from 2019 through 2020. Patients presenting for colorectal cancer screening or surveillance were randomized to CADe colonoscopy first or high-definition white light (HDWL) colonoscopy first, followed immediately by the other procedure in tandem fashion by the same endoscopist. The primary outcome was adenoma miss rate (AMR), and secondary outcomes included sessile serrated lesion (SSL) miss rate and adenomas per colonoscopy (APC). A total of 232 patients entered the study, with 116 patients randomized to undergo CADe colonoscopy first and 116 patients randomized to undergo HDWL colonoscopy first. After the exclusion of 9 patients, the study cohort included 223 patients. AMR was lower in the CADe-first group compared with the HDWL-first group (20.12% [34/169] vs 31.25% [45/144]; odds ratio [OR], 1.8048; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0780-3.0217; P = .0247). SSL miss rate was lower in the CADe-first group (7.14% [1/14]) vs the HDWL-first group (42.11% [8/19]; P = .0482). First-pass APC was higher in the CADe-first group (1.19 [standard deviation (SD), 2.03] vs 0.90 [SD, 1.55]; P = .0323). First-pass ADR was 50.44% in the CADe-first group and 43.64 % in the HDWL-first group (P = .3091). In this U.S. multicenter tandem colonoscopy randomized controlled trial, we demonstrate a decrease in AMR and SSL miss rate and an increase in first-pass APC with the use of a CADe-system when compared with HDWL colonoscopy alone.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
psc完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
超级向薇完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
4秒前
自由竺完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
王思远完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
体贴的曼凝完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
寻梦应助故意的柜子采纳,获得10
10秒前
贪玩心情完成签到,获得积分20
13秒前
13秒前
小木同学完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
虚幻的捕完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
小太阳完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
ly发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
嘤嘤怪啊完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
仙林AK47发布了新的文献求助40
17秒前
tomcruise完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Bonnie120606发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
在水一方应助Jiling采纳,获得10
20秒前
xx完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
科研小蔡发布了新的文献求助30
22秒前
小木同学发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
23秒前
清风发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
511400完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
陈住气发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
peiying完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
adjani完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
动听白风应助啊啊啊啊啊采纳,获得10
29秒前
29秒前
寻梦应助故意的柜子采纳,获得10
30秒前
zwy109发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
Burney应助一颗白菜采纳,获得10
31秒前
沐雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
主任发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
赫连dd完成签到,获得积分20
31秒前
长zyzy发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
娜娜子欧发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
jiangzong应助小栗子采纳,获得10
36秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Gründe der Seele:Die Wiener Psychatrie im 20.Jahrhundert 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7272496
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8893389
关于积分的说明 18800533
捐赠科研通 6946882
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3204839
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2376921
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2180226