光容积图
医学
接收机工作特性
置信区间
计算机科学
电容描记术
血压
生物信号
平均动脉压
麻醉
心脏病学
内科学
心率
滤波器(信号处理)
电信
无线
计算机视觉
作者
Solam Lee,Hyung‐Chul Lee,Yu Seong Chu,Seung Woo Song,Gyo Jin Ahn,Hunju Lee,Sejung Yang,Sang Baek Koh
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.035
摘要
BackgroundIntraoperative hypotension is associated with a risk of postoperative organ dysfunction. In this study, we aimed to present deep learning algorithms for real-time predictions 5, 10, and 15 min before a hypotensive event.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, deep learning algorithms were developed and validated using biosignal waveforms acquired from patient monitoring of noncardiac surgery. The classification model was a binary classifier of a hypotensive event (MAP <65 mm Hg) or a non-hypotensive event by analysing biosignal waveforms. The regression model was developed to directly estimate the MAP. The primary outcome was area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve and the mean absolute error (MAE).ResultsIn total, 3301 patients were included. For invasive models, the multichannel model with an arterial pressure waveform, electrocardiography, photoplethysmography, and capnography showed greater AUROC than the arterial-pressure-only models (AUROC15-min, 0.897 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.894–0.900] vs 0.891 [95% CI: 0.888–0.894]) and lesser MAE (MAE15-min, 7.76 mm Hg [95% CI: 7.64–7.87 mm Hg] vs 8.12 mm Hg [95% CI: 8.02–8.21 mm Hg]). For the noninvasive models, the multichannel model showed greater AUROCs than that of the photoplethysmography-only models (AUROC15-min, 0.762 [95% CI: 0.756–0.767] vs 0.694 [95% CI: 0.686–0.702]) and lesser MAEs (MAE15-min, 11.68 mm Hg [95% CI: 11.57–11.80 mm Hg] vs 12.67 [95% CI: 12.56–12.79 mm Hg]).ConclusionsDeep learning models can predict hypotensive events based on biosignals acquired using invasive and noninvasive patient monitoring. In addition, the model shows better performance when using combined rather than single signals.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI