Tezepelumab in Adults with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

慢性鼻-鼻窦炎 鼻息肉 医学 皮肤病科 内科学 胃肠病学
作者
Brian J. Lipworth,Joseph K. Han,Martin Desrosiers,Claire Hopkins,Stella E. Lee,Joaquim Mullol,Oliver Pfaar,Ting Li,Claudia Chen,Gun Almqvist,Mary Kay Margolis,Julie McLaren,Shankar Jagadeesh,J. Mackay,Ayman Megally,Åsa Hellqvist,Vaishali S. Mankad,Lila Bahadori,Sandhia S Ponnarambil
出处
期刊:The New England Journal of Medicine [Massachusetts Medical Society]
卷期号:392 (12): 1178-1188 被引量:134
标识
DOI:10.1056/nejmoa2414482
摘要

BACKGROUND: Treatment with tezepelumab has been effective for sinonasal symptoms in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and a history of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, but its efficacy and safety in adults with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults with physician-diagnosed, symptomatic, severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps to receive standard care and either tezepelumab (at a dose of 210 mg) or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The coprimary end points were the changes from baseline in the total nasal-polyp score (range, 0 to 4 [for each nostril]; higher scores indicate greater severity) and the mean nasal-congestion score (range, 0 to 3; higher scores indicate greater severity) at week 52. Key secondary end points assessed in the overall population were the loss-of-smell score, the total score on the Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22; range, 0 to 110; higher scores indicate greater severity), the Lund-Mackay score (range, 0 to 24; higher scores indicate greater severity), the total symptom score (range, 0 to 24; higher scores indicate greater severity), and the first decision to treat with nasal-polyp surgery or use of systemic glucocorticoid therapy, or both, assessed in time-to-event analyses (individual and composite). RESULTS: In total, 203 patients were assigned to receive tezepelumab and 205 to receive placebo. At week 52, the patients who received tezepelumab had significant improvements in the total nasal-polyp score (mean difference vs. placebo, -2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.39 to -1.74) and the mean nasal-congestion score (-1.03; 95% CI, -1.20 to -0.86) (P<0.001 for both scores). Tezepelumab significantly improved the loss-of-smell score (mean difference vs. placebo, -1.00; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.83), SNOT-22 total score (-27.26; 95% CI, -32.32 to -22.21), Lund-Mackay score (-5.72; 95% CI, -6.39 to -5.06), and total symptom score (-6.89; 95% CI, -8.02 to -5.76) (P<0.001 for all scores). Surgery for nasal polyps was indicated in significantly fewer patients in the tezepelumab group (0.5%) than in the placebo group (22.1%) (hazard ratio, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.09); there was significantly less use of systemic glucocorticoids with tezepelumab (5.2%) than with placebo (18.3%) (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.27) (P<0.001 for both time-to-event analyses). CONCLUSIONS: Tezepelumab therapy led to significantly greater reductions in the size of nasal polyps, the severity of nasal congestion and sinonasal symptoms, and the use of nasal-polyp surgery and systemic glucocorticoids than placebo in adults with severe, uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. (Funded by AstraZeneca and Amgen; WAYPOINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04851964.).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
chil完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
zhaolee发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
小曹医生完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
英姑应助wss123456采纳,获得10
1秒前
夹心小僧完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
YYxz发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
niu完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
曾经的问夏完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
111111完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
上官志鹏完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
梓鑫完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
111111发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
JiangZhihan发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
科研通AI2S应助上官志鹏采纳,获得10
9秒前
xzj发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
阿猫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
ANK完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
a均发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
小巧的柚子完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Haier完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
科研通AI2S应助蔡从安采纳,获得10
17秒前
充电宝应助YYxz采纳,获得10
19秒前
a均完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
科研通AI6.2应助ccc采纳,获得10
21秒前
目眩完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
铁头霸霸完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
落后的夜阑完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
pete发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
24秒前
molihuakai应助xzj采纳,获得10
24秒前
暴躁莹子完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
zhaolee发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
LJJ完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
东东子完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
SAVP发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
朝花夕拾完成签到,获得积分0
28秒前
蔡从安完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
高分求助中
Psychopathic Traits and Quality of Prison Life 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
Forced degradation and stability indicating LC method for Letrozole: A stress testing guide 500
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6451350
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8263270
关于积分的说明 17607007
捐赠科研通 5516127
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2903669
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1880634
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1722651