神经刺激
迷走神经电刺激
脑深部刺激
癫痫
认知
医学
科克伦图书馆
癫痫外科
脑刺激
刺激
抗药性癫痫
睡眠剥夺对认知功能的影响
麻醉
荟萃分析
物理医学与康复
心理学
内科学
迷走神经
精神科
帕金森病
疾病
作者
Jordan Lam,Marcus Williams,Mark M. Ashla,Darrin J. Lee
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106591
摘要
The cognitive impacts of resective surgery for epilepsy have been well-studied. While seizure outcomes for less invasive, neuromodulatory treatments are promising, there is a paucity of data for cognitive outcomes.Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched on November 2019. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting cognitive outcomes following chronic (>6 months) vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) for epilepsy in at least five patients. Studies reporting acute on-off effects of stimulation were also included. Studies were screened, extracted of data, and assessed for bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools by two independent reviewers. Prospero ID: CRD42020184432.Of 8443 studies screened, 29 studies were included. Nineteen investigated the effects of chronic stimulation (11 VNS, 6 DBS, 2 RNS): 10 (53 %) reported no change compared to preoperative baseline; 8 (42 %) reported some improvement in one or more cognitive domain; 1 (5%) reported decline. Ten investigated the effects of acute stimulation (5 VNS, 5 DBS): 3 (30 %) reported no change; 4 reported improvement (40 %); 3 (30 %) reported decline. Eight (28 %) did not report statistical analysis.Long-term cognitive outcomes are at least stable following VNS, DBS and RNS. Acute effects of stimulation are less clear. However, data are limited by number, size, and quality. More robust evidence is needed to properly assess the cognitive effects of each of these treatments.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI