Nonampullary Duodenal Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Sporadic Patients Lack the DNA Content Abnormality That is Characteristic of the Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence Involved in the Development of Other Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Nonampullary duodenal adenomas (NADAs) develop sporadically or in the setting of a hereditary syndrome such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Although they are thought to progress into duodenal adenocarcinomas via an adenoma to carcinoma sequence similar to colorectal cancer, limited data suggested that they may be biologically dissimilar to colorectal adenomas. The clinicopathologic features of 71 patients diagnosed with NADAs (37 FAP and 34 sporadic) were analyzed. From the 71 patients, 89 NADA biopsies (42 FAP and 47 sporadic) were evaluated by DNA flow cytometry. Eighty-two samples showed low-grade dysplasia, and 7 demonstrated high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Twenty-one low-grade adenomas of the ileal pouch (n=19) and jejunum (n=2) from 15 FAP patients who underwent total proctocolectomy were also analyzed by DNA flow cytometry. The FAP patients were more likely to be younger (mean: 28 y) and have multifocal disease (92%) than the sporadic patients (66 y and 24%, respectively) (P<0.001). Most NADAs presented as polypoid lesions (87%) in the duodenal bulb and/or second portion of the duodenum (94%). Sporadic NADAs (mean: 2.4 cm) were significantly larger than FAP-related NADAs (1.3 cm) (P=0.005). Three (4%) patients (2 sporadic and 1 FAP) had high-grade NADAs at the first endoscopy, while the remaining 68 (96%) patients had low-grade dysplasia. Two additional sporadic and 1 FAP patients developed HGD on follow-up. Although the overall detection rate of advanced neoplasia (either HGD or adenocarcinoma) was similar between the FAP (n=5; 14%) and sporadic groups (n=4; 12%) (P=1.000), 3 FAP patients (all with Spigelman stage III to IV) developed adenocarcinoma in the duodenum (n=2) or in the ileal pouch (n=1) within a mean follow-up time of 76 months, while no adenocarcinoma was found in the sporadic group. Of the 37 FAP patients, 29 (78%) had a history of total proctocolectomy, and 15 (52%) developed low-grade adenomas in the ileal pouch with (n=2) or without (n=13) jejunal involvement (vs. 0% in the sporadic patients, P<0.001). All 15 patients had ≥Spigelman stage II. Aneuploidy was detected in only 1 (1%) sporadic NADA with HGD, whereas the remaining 109 duodenal, ileal pouch, and jejunal adenomas showed normal DNA content. The overall 3-, 9-, and 15-year detection rates of adenocarcinoma (in the duodenum and ileal pouch) in all NADA patients were 1.4%, 7.2%, and 18.8%, respectively. Three-, 9-, and 15-year detection rates of adenocarcinoma in the FAP patients were 2.7%, 9.7%, and 22.6%, respectively, while these rates remained at 0% in the sporadic patients. In conclusion, FAP-related NADAs have distinct clinicopathologic features compared with their sporadic counterpart. However, the vast majority of both FAP-related and sporadic NADAs (99%) lack the DNA content abnormality that is characteristic of the typical adenoma-carcinoma sequence involved in other gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. Although adenocarcinoma is more likely to develop in FAP patients with a high adenoma burden, probably due to the higher likelihood that some advanced lesions are missed endoscopically, FAP-related and sporadic NADAs may have a comparable risk of developing advanced neoplasia on a per-adenoma basis.