银耳霉素
杜瓦卢马布
阿替唑单抗
医学
内科学
贝伐单抗
肿瘤科
肝细胞癌
无容量
回顾性队列研究
癌
胃肠病学
完全响应
外科
免疫疗法
实体瘤疗效评价标准
癌症
临床终点
进行性疾病
泌尿科
临床研究阶段
病变
阶段(地层学)
免疫检查点
作者
Akifumi Kuwano,Masayoshi Yada,Kosuke Tanaka,Taikan Hamamoto,RYOTARO TANAKA,Kazuki Kurosaka,Hideo Suzuki,Kenta Motomura
出处
期刊:Anticancer Research
[International Institute of Anticancer Research (IIAR) Conferences 1997. Athens, Greece. Abstracts]
日期:2026-08-31
卷期号:46 (9): 5217-5227
标识
DOI:10.21873/anticanres.18366
摘要
BACKGROUND/AIM: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies are standard treatment options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, conventional endpoints such as objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival may not fully capture response dynamics, including depth of response (DpR), time to response, and duration of response. This study descriptively evaluated response dynamics in patients with unresectable HCC treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 148 patients with unresectable HCC who received durvalumab-tremelimumab (n=53) or atezolizumab-bevacizumab (n=95). A reduction of ≥50% in target lesion diameter was defined as DpR50. Because of baseline imbalances and differences in observation period, the analysis was only descriptive and hypothesis-generating. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received durvalumab-tremelimumab and 95 received atezolizumab-bevacizumab. The overall response rate was 35.8% for the durvalumab-tremelimumab group and 27.4% for the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group, whereas the disease control rates were 54.7% and 71.6%, respectively. DpR50 was observed in 26.4% and 11.6% of patients, respectively. The median times to response were 2.3 and 3.3 months, and the median durations of response were 22.3 and 10.0 months, respectively. Durable response lasting ≥6 months occurred in 24.5% and 15.8% of all treated patients, respectively. The median PFS was 5.2 and 7.0 months, and median OS was 17.0 and 22.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Therapy with durvalumab-tremelimumab was associated with deeper and more durable tumor shrinkage in selected responders, whereas atezolizumab-bevacizumab provided broader disease control mainly through stable disease. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI