确定性
分级(工程)
科克伦合作
系统回顾
计算机科学
图书馆学
科克伦图书馆
荟萃分析
医学
梅德林
认识论
哲学
工程类
政治学
内科学
法学
土木工程
作者
Holger Jens Schünemann,Julian P. T. Higgins,Gunn Elisabeth Vist,Paul Glasziou,Elie A. Akl,Nicole Skoetz,Gordon Henry Guyatt,on behalf of the Cochrane GRADEing Methods Group (formerly Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group) and the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
标识
DOI:10.1002/9781119536604.ch14
摘要
Planning for the ‘Summary of findings’ table starts early in the systematic review, with the selection of the outcomes to be included in: the review; and the ‘Summary of findings’ table. This is a crucial step, and one that review authors need to address carefully. To ensure production of optimally useful information, Cochrane Reviews begin by developing a review question and by listing all main outcomes that are important to patients and other decision makers. The GRADE approach to assessing the certainty of the evidence defines and operationalizes a rating process that helps separate outcomes into those that are critical, important or not important for decision making. Review authors should report the grading of the certainty of evidence in the Results section for each outcome for which this has been performed, providing the rationale for downgrading or upgrading the evidence, and referring to the ‘Summary of findings’ table where applicable.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI