医学
审计
梅德林
奇纳
科克伦图书馆
医疗保健
家庭医学
系统回顾
随机对照试验
护理部
心理干预
内科学
管理
政治学
法学
经济
经济增长
作者
Noah Ivers,Sharlini Yogasingam,Meagan Lacroix,Kevin A. Brown,Jesmin Antony,Charlene Soobiah,Michelle Simeoni,Thomas A. Willis,Jacob Crawshaw,Vivi Antonopoulou,Carly Meyer,Nathan M. Solbak,Brenna J Murray,E. Brian Butler,Simone Lepage,Martina Giltenane,Mary D Carter,Guillaume Fontaine,Michael Sykes,Michael Halasy
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library
[Elsevier]
日期:2025-03-25
卷期号:2025 (3): CD000259-CD000259
被引量:27
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub4
摘要
A&F can be effective in improving professional practice, but effects vary in size. A&F is most often delivered along with co-interventions which can contribute additive effects. A&F may be most effective when designed to help recipients prioritise and take action on high-priority clinical issues and with the following characteristics: 1. targets important performance metrics where health professionals have substantial room for improvement (audit); 2. measures the individual recipient's practice, rather than their team or organisation (audit); 3. involves a local champion with an existing relationship with the recipient (feedback); 4. includes multiple, interactive modalities such as verbal and written (feedback); 5. compares performance to top peers or a benchmark (feedback); 6. facilitates engagement with the feedback (action); 7. features an actionable plan with specific advice for improvement (action). These conclusions require further confirmatory research; future research should focus on discerning ways to optimise the effectiveness of A&F interventions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI